ILCS » Chapter 410 · Act 50
Illinois Compiled Statutes

410 ILCS 50/0.01 (2026)

Short Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(410 ILCS 50/0.01) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 5400)
    Sec. 0.01. Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Medical Patient Rights Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1997–2015 · leading case: Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Ctr., 688 N.E.2d 106 (Ill. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Ctr., 688 N.E.2d 106 (Ill. 1997). · cites it 2× “2d 253 (recognizing hospital's duty to assume responsibility for the care of its patients); see also 410 ILCS 50/0.01 et seq. (West 1994) (Medical Patient Rights Act) (establishing right of patient to receive health care from hospital which is consistent with sound medical…”
Turner v. Mem'l Med. Ctr., 911 N.E.2d 369 (Ill. 2009). “The complaint alleges only two such sources: the Joint Commission standards and the Medical Patient Rights Act (410 ILCS 50/0.01 et seq. (West 2006)). Because plaintiffs complaint fails to set forth a specific public policy, much less a clearly mandated public policy, we…”
Coy v. Washington Cnty. Hosp. Dist., 866 N.E.2d 651 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 2× “Coy cite both the Medical Patient Rights Act *662 (410 ILCS 50/0.01 et seq. (West 2004)) and the Hospital Licensing Act (210 ILCS 85/1 et seq.”
Essig v. Advocate Bromenn Med. Ctr., 2015 IL App (4th) 140546 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “ed to the obliteration of Kathryn's ureter; (8) failed to properly manage Kathryn's postsurgical condition; (9) failed to timely, properly, and adequately inform Kathryn of the cause and extent of the injury to her ureter; (10) failed to fully inform Kathryn of the consequences…”
Acuff v. IBP, Inc., 77 F. Supp. 2d 914 (C.D. Ill. 1999). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, although the Illinois Supreme Court might not adopt the tort of intrusion upon seclusion to remedy every type of offensive intrusion in the workplace, this Court finds that the supreme court would, at a minimum, adopt this tort as a potential remedy for an employee…”
Kyoung Suk Kim v. St. Elizabeth's Hosp. of the Hosp. Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis, 918 N.E.2d 256 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “(2005)) and the Medical Patient Rights Act (410 ILCS 50/0.01 et seq. (West 2004)), violated the Mental Health Confidentiality Act (740 ILCS 110/1 et seq.”
Engstrom v. Provena Hospitals, 819 N.E.2d 778 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 4× “" Specifically, she asserts that this public policy is set forth in (1) the Medical Patient Rights Act (Patient Rights Act) (410 ILCS 50/0.01 through 99 (West 2002)), (2) the Licensing Act (210 ILCS 85/1 through 16 (West 2002)), and (3) certain hospital licensing requirements of…”
Essig v. Advocate Bromenn Med. Ctr., 2015 IL App (4th) 140546 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “d to timely recognize and treat that tear; (7) caused or contributed to the obliteration of Kathryn’s ureter; (8) failed to properly manage Kathryn’s postsurgical condition; (9) failed to timely, properly, and adequately inform Kathryn of the cause and extent of the injury to…”
Engstrom v. Provena Hospitals (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 2× “" Specifically, she asserts that this public policy is set forth in (1) the Medical Patient Rights Act (Patient Rights Act) (410 ILCS 50/0.01 through 99 (West 2002)), (2) the Licensing Act (210 ILCS 85/1 through 16 (West 2002)), and (3) certain hospital licensing requirements of…”
Kim v. St. Elizabeth's Hosp. of the Hosp. Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “(2005)) and the Medical Patient Rights Act (410 ILCS 50/0.01 et seq. (West 2004)), violated the Mental Health Confidentiality Act (740 ILCS 110/1 et seq.”
Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Ctr. (Ill. 1997). “2d at 332-33 (recognizing hospital's duty to assume responsibility for the care of its patients); see also 410 ILCS 50/0.01 et seq. (West 1994) (Medical Patient Rights Act) (establishing right of patient to receive health care from hospital which is consistent with sound medical…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.