Illinois Compiled Statutes
5 ILCS 350/0.01 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(5 ILCS 350/0.01)
(from Ch. 127, par. 1300)
Sec. 0.01.
Short title.
This Act may be cited as the
State Employee Indemnification Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1996–2020 · leading case: People v. Burdunice, 811 N.E.2d 678 (Ill. 2004).
People v. Burdunice, 811 N.E.2d 678 (Ill. 2004). “5 of the Act, which amended the State Employee Indemnification Act (5 ILCS 350/0.01 et seq. (West 1996)) to allow the Illinois Attorney General to file counterclaims in civil suits against state employees, did not relate to the subject of the remainder of the Act, criminal law.”
People Ex Rel. Ulrich v. Stukel, 689 N.E.2d 319 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “The plaintiff claimed that such funding by the University, in relevant part, circumvented the role of the Attorney General under the State Employee Indemnification Act (5 ILCS 350/0.01 et seq. (West 1994)) and violated the University of Illinois Act (110 ILCS 305/7a (West 1994)).”
Griffin v. Fluellen, 670 N.E.2d 845 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “The Attorney General is authorized under the State Employee Indemnification Act (5 ILCS 350/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)) to represent state employees in any civil proceeding commenced against them that arises from any act or omission occurring within the scope of the employee’s…”
People v. Foster, 737 N.E.2d 1125 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “Section 0.5 of Public Act 89— 688 amends the Act to allow the Attorney General to file counterclaims in such civil actions.”
People v. Burdunice, 791 N.E.2d 1148 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “The sections respectively amend the following acts: (1) the State Employee Indemnification Act (5 ILCS 350/0.01 et seq. (West 1996)); (2) the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/1—1 et seq.”
Bortone v. Court of Claims, 2020 IL App (1st) 190853-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “1-19-0853 defend Marinatos, Vaio and Ramsey as well as the judgment rendered in their case as it was required to do under the State Employee Indemnification Act (5 ILCS 350/0.01 et seq. (West 2016)). Lastly, as to a final judgment on the merits, the Board argued that the jury’s…”
People v. Burdunice (Ill. 2004). “5 of the Act, which amended the State Employee Indemnification Act (5 ILCS 350/0.01 et seq. (West 1996)) to allow the Illinois Attorney General to file counterclaims in civil suits against state employees, did not relate to the subject of the remainder of the Act, criminal law.”
People ex Rel. Ulrich v. Stukel (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “The plaintiff claimed that such funding by the University, in relevant part, circumvented the role of the attorney general under the State Employee Indemnification Act (5 ILCS 350/0.01 et seq . (West 1994)), and violated the University of Illinois Act (110 ILCS 305/7a (West…”
People v. Foster (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “Section 0.5 of Public Act 89-688 amends the Act to allow the Attorney General to file counterclaims in such civil actions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|