ILCS » Chapter 50 · Act 315
Illinois Compiled Statutes

50 ILCS 315/2 (2026)

All elected or appointed officials of units of local government, and clerks of the circuit courts, authorized by law to collect fees which collection is not prohibited by Section 9 of Article VII of the Constitution, shall deposit all such collected fees upon receipt with the county treasurer or treasurer of such other unit of local government, as the case may be, except as otherwise provided by law; and except that such officials may maintain overpayments, tax redemptions, trust funds and special funds as provided for by law or local ordinance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(50 ILCS 315/2) (from Ch. 85, par. 722)
    Sec. 2. All elected or appointed officials of units of local government, and clerks of the circuit courts, authorized by law to collect fees which collection is not prohibited by Section 9 of Article VII of the Constitution, shall deposit all such collected fees upon receipt with the county treasurer or treasurer of such other unit of local government, as the case may be, except as otherwise provided by law; and except that such officials may maintain overpayments, tax redemptions, trust funds and special funds as provided for by law or local ordinance.
(Source: P.A. 85-408.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–1997 · leading case: Kaden v. Kagann, 635 N.E.2d 515 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kaden v. Kagann, 635 N.E.2d 515 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff contended that her relief should be granted because the Fee Deposit Act (50 ILCS 315/2 (West 1992)), which mandates that circuit court clerks deposit fees collected by them with the county treasurer, violates: (1) section 2 of article VIII of the Illinois…”
Kaden v. Pucinski, 678 N.E.2d 792 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of section 2 of the Fee Deposit Act (50 ILCS 315/2 (West 1992)) and section 27.”
Kaden v. Pucinski, No. 1-95-0965 (Ill. App. Ct. Apr. 16, 1997). “Plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of section 2 of the Fee Deposit Act (50 ILCS 315/2 (West 1992)), and section 27.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.