ILCS » Chapter 510 · Act 70
Illinois Compiled Statutes

510 ILCS 70/16 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(510 ILCS 70/16)
    Sec. 16. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 95-331, eff. 8-21-07. Repealed by P.A. 95-560, eff. 8-30-07.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1994–2002 · leading case: People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 24× “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals'.”
People v. Dixon, 721 N.E.2d 1172 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). · cites it 2× “15 (West 1996) & amending 510 ILCS 70/16 (West 1994))); section 70 amends the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/1-100 et seq.”
People v. Thornton, 676 N.E.2d 1024 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “510 ILCS 70/16(c)(6) (West 1994). The offense is therefore punishable by a sentence of incarceration of not more than 30 days.”
People v. Shanklin (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 12× “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals.”
People v. Lane, 743 N.E.2d 1107 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “15 (West 1996) and amending 510 ILCS 70/16 (West 1996)). Section 70 gives a person drawing blood or obtaining urine immunity when that person acts upon the request of law enforcement and the liquid is to be used for evidentiary purposes.”
People v. Chernetti, 629 N.E.2d 229 (1994). “716(c)(6) (now 510 ILCS 70/ 16(c)(6) (West 1992))) and, as such, is punishable by not more than 30 days in prison (Ill.”
People v. Dixon (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “15 (West 1996) & amending 510 ILCS 70/16 (West 1994))) ; section 70 amends the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/1-100 et seq .”
510 ILCS 70/16(b)(1): 2 cases
People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals'.”
People v. Shanklin (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals.”
510 ILCS 70/16(b)(l): 1 case
People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals'.”
510 ILCS 70/16(c): 2 cases
People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals'.”
People v. Shanklin (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals.”
510 ILCS 70/16(c)(1): 2 cases
People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals'.”
People v. Shanklin (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals.”
510 ILCS 70/16(c)(2): 2 cases
People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals'.”
People v. Shanklin (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals.”
510 ILCS 70/16(c)(6): 4 cases
People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals'.”
People v. Thornton, 676 N.E.2d 1024 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “510 ILCS 70/16(c)(6) (West 1994). The offense is therefore punishable by a sentence of incarceration of not more than 30 days.”
People v. Chernetti, 629 N.E.2d 229 (1994). “716(c)(6) (now 510 ILCS 70/ 16(c)(6) (West 1992))) and, as such, is punishable by not more than 30 days in prison (Ill.”
People v. Shanklin (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals.”
510 ILCS 70/16(c)(7): 2 cases
People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals'.”
People v. Shanklin (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals.”
510 ILCS 70/16(c)(l): 1 case
People v. Shanklin, 769 N.E.2d 547 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 510 ILCS 70/16 (c)(1) (West 2000). The trial court interpreted the aforementioned language as limiting the applicability of subsection (c) to dogs only and not to other animals'.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.