Illinois Compiled Statutes
625 ILCS 5/11-301 (2026)
Department to adopt sign manual
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(625 ILCS 5/11-301)
(from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 11-301)
Sec. 11-301.
Department to adopt sign manual.
(a) The Department shall adopt a State manual and specifications for a
uniform system of traffic-control devices consistent with this Chapter for
use upon highways within this State. Such manual shall include the
adoption of the R 7-8 sign adopted by the United States Department of
Transportation to designate the reservation of parking
facilities for a person with disabilities.
Non-conforming signs in use prior to January
1, 1985 shall not constitute a violation during their useful lives, which
shall not be extended by other means than normal maintenance. The manual
shall also specify insofar
as practicable the minimum warrants justifying the use of the various
traffic control devices. Such uniform system shall correlate with and,
where not inconsistent with Illinois highway conditions, conform to the
system set forth in the most recent edition of the national manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways.
(b) Signs adopted by the Department to designate the reservation of
parking facilities for a person with disabilities shall also exhibit, in a
manner determined by the Department, the words "$100 Fine".
(c) If the amount of a fine is changed, the Department shall change the
design of the
signs to indicate
the current amount of the fine.
(Source: P.A. 88-685, eff. 1-24-95; 89-533, eff. 1-1-97.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1995–2022 · leading case: Snyder v. Curran Twp., 657 N.E.2d 988 (Ill. 1995).
Snyder v. Curran Twp., 657 N.E.2d 988 (Ill. 1995). “NOTES [1] Pursuant to the authority conferred under section 11-301 of the Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11-301 ( West 1992 )), the Department of Transportation adopted the Illinois Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (see 92 Ill.”
Crespo-Fregoso v. City of Chicago, 2021 IL App (1st) 200972 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “cc/26JB-9ZBT]), which was adopted pursuant to statute (625 ILCS 5/11-301 (West 2018)). The City argued that it was not liable for plaintiff’s -3- injury because (1) plaintiff was not an intended and permitted user of the service drive, (2) the pothole was an open and obvious…”
Vill. of Lisle v. Spelson, 2019 IL App (2d) 180673 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “625 ILCS 5/11-301(a) (West 2016). “Signs adopted by the Department to designate the reservation of parking facilities for a person with disabilities shall also exhibit, in a manner determined by the Department, the words ‘$100 Fine’.”
Vill. of Algonquin v. Sato, 2018 IL App (2d) 170089 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “3d 532 ; see 625 ILCS 5/11-301(a) (West 2016). Further, adopting section 11-305(a) of the Code, the ordinance stated that an official traffic-control device shall be presumed to comply with the requirements of the Code unless competent evidence establishes otherwise.”
Vill. of Mount Prospect v. Kurtev, 2017 IL App (1st) 170493 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “Mount Prospect Village Code § 18.306(C) (adopted 1981). ¶ 9 The Village municipal traffic code follows the Illinois Vehicle Code ( 625 ILCS 5/1-100 et seq.”
Vill. of Algonquin v. Sato, 2018 IL App (2d) 170089 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “Kurtev, 2017 IL App (1st) 170493, ¶ 9 ; see 625 ILCS 5/11-301(a) (West 2016). Further, adopting section 11-305(a) of the Code, the ordinance stated that an official traffic-control device shall be presumed to comply with the requirements of the Code unless competent evidence…”
People v. Lambert, 2019 IL App (5th) 180248 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “12 (West 2014); 625 ILCS 5/11-301, 11-303 (West 2014); Ky.”
People v. Kelly, 802 N.E.2d 850 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “01 (2000), adopted pursuant to 625 ILCS 5/11-301 (West 2000). Under the dissent's reading of section 11-306(a)(1), a car may stop indefinitely at a green light.”
People v. Lambert, 2019 IL App (5th) 180248 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “12 (West 2014); 625 ILCS 5/11-301, 11-303 (West 2014); Ky.”
People v. Knight, 2022 IL App (3d) 210521-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “” 625 ILCS 5/11-301(a) (West 2019). 6 Smith Road signage as his defense against the only actual charged conduct of unlawful use of the bridge, we agree with the trial court’s characterization of his contentions.”
Hickey v. Olivia (N.D. Ill. 2022). “The statutory duties include the duty to avoid operating a vehicle at a “speed which is greater than is reasonable and proper with regard to traffic conditions” (625 ILCS 5/11-601); the duty to drive on the “right half of the roadway” (625 ILCS 5/11-701); the duty to “obey the…”
— 625 ILCS 5/11-301(a) — 6 cases
Vill. of Lisle v. Spelson, 2019 IL App (2d) 180673 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “625 ILCS 5/11-301(a) (West 2016). “Signs adopted by the Department to designate the reservation of parking facilities for a person with disabilities shall also exhibit, in a manner determined by the Department, the words ‘$100 Fine’.”
Vill. of Algonquin v. Sato, 2018 IL App (2d) 170089 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “3d 532 ; see 625 ILCS 5/11-301(a) (West 2016). Further, adopting section 11-305(a) of the Code, the ordinance stated that an official traffic-control device shall be presumed to comply with the requirements of the Code unless competent evidence establishes otherwise.”
Vill. of Mount Prospect v. Kurtev, 2017 IL App (1st) 170493 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “Mount Prospect Village Code § 18.306(C) (adopted 1981). ¶ 9 The Village municipal traffic code follows the Illinois Vehicle Code ( 625 ILCS 5/1-100 et seq.”
Vill. of Algonquin v. Sato, 2018 IL App (2d) 170089 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “Kurtev, 2017 IL App (1st) 170493, ¶ 9 ; see 625 ILCS 5/11-301(a) (West 2016). Further, adopting section 11-305(a) of the Code, the ordinance stated that an official traffic-control device shall be presumed to comply with the requirements of the Code unless competent evidence…”
People v. Knight, 2022 IL App (3d) 210521-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “” 625 ILCS 5/11-301(a) (West 2019). 6 Smith Road signage as his defense against the only actual charged conduct of unlawful use of the bridge, we agree with the trial court’s characterization of his contentions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|