ILCS » Chapter 625 · Act 57
Illinois Compiled Statutes

625 ILCS 57/25 (2026)

Safety

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(625 ILCS 57/25)
    (Section scheduled to be repealed on September 1, 2028)
    Sec. 25. Safety.
    (a) The TNC shall implement a zero tolerance policy on the use of drugs or alcohol while a TNC driver is providing TNC services or is logged into the TNC's digital network but is not providing TNC services.
    (b) The TNC shall provide notice of the zero tolerance policy on its website, as well as procedures to report a complaint about a driver with whom a passenger was matched and whom the passenger reasonably suspects was under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the course of the trip.
    (c) Upon receipt of a passenger's complaint alleging a violation of the zero tolerance policy, the TNC shall immediately suspend the TNC driver's access to the TNC's digital platform, and shall conduct an investigation into the reported incident. The suspension shall last the duration of the investigation.
    (d) The TNC shall require that any motor vehicle that a TNC driver will use to provide TNC services meets vehicle safety and emissions requirements for a private motor vehicle in this State.
    (e) TNCs or TNC drivers are not common carriers, contract carriers or motor carriers, as defined by applicable State law, nor do they provide taxicab or for-hire vehicle service. This subsection (e) is inoperative on and after January 1, 2024.
(Source: P.A. 103-527, eff. 8-11-23.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2024 · leading case: Doe v. Lyft, Inc., 2020 IL App (1st) 191328 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Doe v. Lyft, Inc., 2020 IL App (1st) 191328 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 5× “July 1, 2017) regarding the scope and constitutionality of section 25(e) of the Transportation Network Providers Act (or Act) (625 ILCS 57/25(e) (West 2018)), which declares that ridesharing companies like Uber and Lyft (called transportation network companies or TNCs under the…”
Doe v. Lyft, Inc., 2020 IL App (1st) 191328 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 5× “July 1, 2017) regarding the scope and constitutionality of section 25(e) of the Transportation Network Providers Act (or Act) (625 ILCS 57/25(e) (West 2018)), which declares that ridesharing companies like Uber and Lyft (called transportation network companies or TNCs under the…”
Aundray Barnes v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “, 625 ILCS 57/25 (e), where Illinois specifically noted in its statute that transportation network companies like Lyft “are not common carriers, contract carriers or motor carriers, as defined by applicable State law, nor do they provide taxicab or for-hire vehicle service.”
625 ILCS 57/25(e): 2 cases
Doe v. Lyft, Inc., 2020 IL App (1st) 191328 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “July 1, 2017) regarding the scope and constitutionality of section 25(e) of the Transportation Network Providers Act (or Act) (625 ILCS 57/25(e) (West 2018)), which declares that ridesharing companies like Uber and Lyft (called transportation network companies or TNCs under the…”
Doe v. Lyft, Inc., 2020 IL App (1st) 191328 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “July 1, 2017) regarding the scope and constitutionality of section 25(e) of the Transportation Network Providers Act (or Act) (625 ILCS 57/25(e) (West 2018)), which declares that ridesharing companies like Uber and Lyft (called transportation network companies or TNCs under the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.