Illinois Compiled Statutes
720 ILCS 5/20.5-6 (2026)
(Renumbered)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(720 ILCS 5/Art. 21 heading) ARTICLE 21.
DAMAGE AND TRESPASS TO PROPERTY
|
(720 ILCS 5/Art. 21, Subdiv. 1 heading) SUBDIVISION 1. DAMAGE TO PROPERTY
(Source: P.A. 97-1108, eff. 1-1-13.) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2006–2008 · leading case: People v. Davison, 883 N.E.2d 648 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
People v. Davison, 883 N.E.2d 648 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “5-6 (West 2002)), arguing (1) the evidence was not sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because anhydrous ammonia is not a "poisonous gas" within the meaning of the statute defining the offense, (2) the sentences he received for possession of a deadly substance,…”
People v. Qualls (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “Qualls, appeals from his conviction for possession of a deadly substance (720 ILCS 5/20.5-6 (West 2002)), arguing that anhydrous ammonia is not a "poisonous gas" within the meaning of the statute defining the offense.”
People v. Davison (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “5-6 (West 2002)), arguing (1) the evidence was not sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because anhydrous ammonia is not a "poisonous gas" within the meaning of the statute defining the offense, (2) the sen- tences he received for possession of a deadly substance,…”
— 720 ILCS 5/20.5-6(a) — 2 cases
People v. Davison, 883 N.E.2d 648 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “5-6 (West 2002)), arguing (1) the evidence was not sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because anhydrous ammonia is not a "poisonous gas" within the meaning of the statute defining the offense, (2) the sentences he received for possession of a deadly substance,…”
People v. Qualls (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “Qualls, appeals from his conviction for possession of a deadly substance (720 ILCS 5/20.5-6 (West 2002)), arguing that anhydrous ammonia is not a "poisonous gas" within the meaning of the statute defining the offense.”
— 720 ILCS 5/20.5-6(b) — 2 cases
People v. Davison, 883 N.E.2d 648 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “5-6 (West 2002)), arguing (1) the evidence was not sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because anhydrous ammonia is not a "poisonous gas" within the meaning of the statute defining the offense, (2) the sentences he received for possession of a deadly substance,…”
People v. Davison (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “5-6 (West 2002)), arguing (1) the evidence was not sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because anhydrous ammonia is not a "poisonous gas" within the meaning of the statute defining the offense, (2) the sen- tences he received for possession of a deadly substance,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|