Illinois Compiled Statutes
720 ILCS 570/214 (2026)
Excluded Substances
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(720 ILCS 570/214)
(from Ch. 56 1/2, par. 1214)
Sec. 214.
Excluded Substances.
(a) Products containing an anabolic steroid, that are expressly intended
for administration
through implants to cattle or other nonhuman species and that have been
approved by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services for that administration, and that are
excluded
from all schedules
under Section 102(41)(B)(1) of the federal Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.
802(41)(B)(1)) are also excluded from Sections 207 and 208 of this Act.
(b) The non-narcotic substances excluded from all schedules of
the Federal Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.)
pursuant to Section 1308.22 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (21 C.F.R. 1308.22), are excluded from all schedules of this
Act.
(Source: P.A. 91-714, eff. 6-2-00.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1997–1998 · leading case: Illinois v. Hanna, 693 N.E.2d 470 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
Illinois v. Hanna, 693 N.E.2d 470 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “Defendant cites section 214 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (Act) (720 ILCS 570/214 (West 1992)), which excludes from all schedules of the Act those substances excluded from the schedules of the Federal Controlled Substances Act ( 21 U.”
People v. Hanna, 679 N.E.2d 812 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “Defendant cites section 214 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (Act) (720 ILCS 570/214 (West 1992)), which excludes from all schedules of the Act those substances excluded from the schedules of the Federal Controlled Substances Act ( 21 U.”
People v. Hanna (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “Defendant cites section 214 of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (Act) (720 ILCS 570/214 (West 1992)), which excludes from all schedules of the Act those substances excluded from the schedules of the federal Controlled Substances Act ( 21 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|