Illinois Compiled Statutes
725 ILCS 225/1 (2026)
Definitions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 225/1)
(from Ch. 60, par. 18)
Sec. 1.
Definitions.
Where appearing in this Act, the term "Governor" includes any person
performing the functions of Governor by authority of the law of this State.
The term "Executive Authority" includes the Governor, and any person
performing the functions of Governor in a state other than this State, and
the term "State", referring to a state other than this State, includes any
other state or territory, organized or unorganized, of the United States of
America.
(Source: Laws 1955, p. 1982.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1994–2012 · leading case: People v. Hoekstra, 863 N.E.2d 847 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
People v. Hoekstra, 863 N.E.2d 847 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “He cites the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (Act) (725 ILCS 225/1 et seq. (West 2002)) to this effect.”
People v. Makiel, 635 N.E.2d 941 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “3d at 67-68.) Extradition proceedings are, however, as the majority tacitly acknowledges, part of the proceedings in court on criminal charges.”
David Coungeris v. Michael F. Sheahan, Sheriff of Cook Cnty., 11 F.3d 726 (7th Cir. 1994). “725 ILCS 225/1, et seq.; People ex rel. Shockley v.”
Jon Behr v. Kenneth Ramsey, 230 F.3d 268 (7th Cir. 2000). “The request was made under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (UCEA), codified in Illinois as 725 ILCS 225/1 et seq. (and in Kentucky as K.”
Cohen v. Sheahan, 700 N.E.2d 1122 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “However, to facilitate extradition proceedings, states like Illinois adopted the provisions of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (Act) (725 ILCS 225/1 et seq. (West 1996)). People ex rel.”
Reid v. State, 670 N.E.2d 949 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). “See 725 ILCS 225/1 to 225/32. . We further observe that the trial court's pretrial order, among other things, directed the parties to file with the court and to exchange with each other witness lists and exhibits no later than one week before trial, and to submit jury…”
Martinez v. Sun, 896 F. Supp. 2d 710 (N.D. Ill. 2012). “Code 35-33-10-3; 725 ILCS 225/1 et seq. Indiana’s version of the Act describes three situations in which a person may be arrested for a *722 crime committed in another state: (1) an arrest pursuant to a warrant issued by-Indiana’s governor based upon a demand for extradition…”
Ely v. Sheahan, 838 N.E.2d 26 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “725 ILCS 225/1 et seq. (West 2002). 5 The holdings of Doran and Kubala cast substantial doubt on the continuing authority of the two cases primarily relied upon by Ely: Nelson v.”
People v. Hoekstra (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “He cites the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (Act) (725 ILCS 225/1 et seq. (West 2002)) to this effect.”
Behr, Jon v. Ramsey, Kenneth (7th Cir. 2000). “The request was made under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (UCEA), codified in Illinois as 725 ILCS 225/1 et seq. (and in Kentucky as K.”
Cohen v. Sheahan (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “However, to facilitate extradition proceedings, states like Illinois adopted the provisions of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (Act) (725 ILCS 225/1 et seq . (West 1996)). People ex rel.”
People v. Meschino, 734 N.E.2d 131 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “Two sections of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (Act) (725 ILCS 225/1 et seq. (West 1998)) apply to this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|