ILCS » Chapter 730 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(730 ILCS 5/3-7-6) (from Ch. 38, par. 1003-7-6)
    Sec. 3-7-6. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 97-697, eff. 6-22-12. Repealed by P.A. 101-235, eff. 1-1-20.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1996–2016 · leading case: Dep't of Corr. Ex Rel. People v. Adams, 663 N.E.2d 1145 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dep't of Corr. Ex Rel. People v. Adams, 663 N.E.2d 1145 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). · cites it 3× “Justice STEIGMANN delivered the opinion of the court: In October 1992, plaintiff, Illinois Department of Corrections (Department), sued defendant, Matthew Adams, to recover costs it had incurred during Adams' incarceration, pursuant to section 3-7-6 of the Unified Code of…”
Wirtz v. Quinn, 2011 IL 111903 (Ill. 2011). “1 (West 1994)), a provision in the Criminal Code of 1961 dealing with the seizure and forfeiture of vehicles ( 720 ILCS 5/36-1 (West 1994)), and a provision in the Unified Code of Corrections concerning reimbursement of expenses by convicted persons to the Department of…”
Wirtz v. Quinn, 953 N.E.2d 899 (Ill. 2011). “1 (West 1994)), a provision in the Criminal Code of 1961 dealing with the seizure and forfeiture of vehicles (720 ILCS 5/36-1 (West 1994)), and a provision in the Unified Code of Corrections concerning reimbursement of expenses by convicted persons to the Department of…”
People Ex Rel. Dep't of Corr. v. Hawkins, 951 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 5× “FACTS In March of 2005, the Department brought the instant action, pursuant to section 3-7-6 of the Unified Code of Corrections (the Code) (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2008)) to recover approximately $456,000 in costs incurred during Hawkins's incarceration.”
Thomas v. The Illinois Dep't of Healthcare & Fam. Servs., 2016 IL App (1st) 143933 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “13 1-14-3933 (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2002)) against persons committed to the Illinois Department of Corrections *** to obtain reimbursement for the costs of their incarceration.”
People Ex Rel. Dept. of Corr. v. Hawkins, 951 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 8× “FACTS In March of 2005, the Department brought the instant action, pursuant to section 3-7-6 of the Unified Code of Corrections (the Code) (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2008)) to recover approximately $456,000 in costs incurred during Hawkins's incarceration.”
People ex rel. Dir. of the Dep't of Corr. v. Melton, 2014 IL App (4th) 130700 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 3× “Procedural Due Process ¶ 10 Defendant argues he was deprived of procedural due process when the trial court granted the State’s request for an order of prejudgment attachment of assets in his trust account without advance notice or a hearing.”
The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. The Dir. of the Dep't of Corr. v. Melton, 2014 IL App (4th) 130700 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 3× “Procedural Due Process ¶ 10 Defendant argues he was deprived of procedural due process when the trial court granted the State's request for an order of prejudgment attachment of assets in his trust account without advance notice or a hearing.”
People ex rel. Dir. of Corr. v. Ruckman (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “the Director of Corrections (the State) filed a complaint against Ruckman pursuant to section 3- 7-6(a) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6(a) (West 2004)), seeking the reimbursement of the expenses the State had incurred as a result of Ruckman's incarceration.”
People Ex Rel. Dir. of Corrs. v. Ruckman, 843 N.E.2d 882 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “the Director of Corrections (the State) filed a complaint against Ruckman pursuant to section 3-7-6(a) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6(a) (West 2004)), seeking the reimbursement of the expenses the State had incurred as a result of Ruckman's incarceration.”
— 730 ILCS 5/3-7-6(a) — 6 cases
People ex rel. Dir. of the Dep't of Corr. v. Melton, 2014 IL App (4th) 130700 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Procedural Due Process ¶ 10 Defendant argues he was deprived of procedural due process when the trial court granted the State’s request for an order of prejudgment attachment of assets in his trust account without advance notice or a hearing.”
People Ex Rel. Dep't of Corr. v. Hawkins, 951 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “FACTS In March of 2005, the Department brought the instant action, pursuant to section 3-7-6 of the Unified Code of Corrections (the Code) (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2008)) to recover approximately $456,000 in costs incurred during Hawkins's incarceration.”
People Ex Rel. Dept. of Corr. v. Hawkins, 951 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “FACTS In March of 2005, the Department brought the instant action, pursuant to section 3-7-6 of the Unified Code of Corrections (the Code) (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2008)) to recover approximately $456,000 in costs incurred during Hawkins's incarceration.”
The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. The Dir. of the Dep't of Corr. v. Melton, 2014 IL App (4th) 130700 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Procedural Due Process ¶ 10 Defendant argues he was deprived of procedural due process when the trial court granted the State's request for an order of prejudgment attachment of assets in his trust account without advance notice or a hearing.”
People ex rel. Dir. of Corr. v. Ruckman (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “the Director of Corrections (the State) filed a complaint against Ruckman pursuant to section 3- 7-6(a) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6(a) (West 2004)), seeking the reimbursement of the expenses the State had incurred as a result of Ruckman's incarceration.”
— 730 ILCS 5/3-7-6(d) — 4 cases
People ex rel. Dir. of the Dep't of Corr. v. Melton, 2014 IL App (4th) 130700 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Procedural Due Process ¶ 10 Defendant argues he was deprived of procedural due process when the trial court granted the State’s request for an order of prejudgment attachment of assets in his trust account without advance notice or a hearing.”
People Ex Rel. Dep't of Corr. v. Hawkins, 951 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “FACTS In March of 2005, the Department brought the instant action, pursuant to section 3-7-6 of the Unified Code of Corrections (the Code) (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2008)) to recover approximately $456,000 in costs incurred during Hawkins's incarceration.”
People Ex Rel. Dept. of Corr. v. Hawkins, 951 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “FACTS In March of 2005, the Department brought the instant action, pursuant to section 3-7-6 of the Unified Code of Corrections (the Code) (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2008)) to recover approximately $456,000 in costs incurred during Hawkins's incarceration.”
The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. The Dir. of the Dep't of Corr. v. Melton, 2014 IL App (4th) 130700 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Procedural Due Process ¶ 10 Defendant argues he was deprived of procedural due process when the trial court granted the State's request for an order of prejudgment attachment of assets in his trust account without advance notice or a hearing.”
— 730 ILCS 5/3-7-6(e)(3) — 5 cases
Thomas v. The Illinois Dep't of Healthcare & Fam. Servs., 2016 IL App (1st) 143933 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “13 1-14-3933 (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2002)) against persons committed to the Illinois Department of Corrections *** to obtain reimbursement for the costs of their incarceration.”
People Ex Rel. Dep't of Corr. v. Hawkins, 951 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “FACTS In March of 2005, the Department brought the instant action, pursuant to section 3-7-6 of the Unified Code of Corrections (the Code) (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2008)) to recover approximately $456,000 in costs incurred during Hawkins's incarceration.”
People Ex Rel. Dept. of Corr. v. Hawkins, 951 N.E.2d 837 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “FACTS In March of 2005, the Department brought the instant action, pursuant to section 3-7-6 of the Unified Code of Corrections (the Code) (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6 (West 2008)) to recover approximately $456,000 in costs incurred during Hawkins's incarceration.”
People ex rel. Dir. of Corr. v. Ruckman (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “the Director of Corrections (the State) filed a complaint against Ruckman pursuant to section 3- 7-6(a) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6(a) (West 2004)), seeking the reimbursement of the expenses the State had incurred as a result of Ruckman's incarceration.”
People Ex Rel. Dir. of Corrs. v. Ruckman, 843 N.E.2d 882 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “the Director of Corrections (the State) filed a complaint against Ruckman pursuant to section 3-7-6(a) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/3-7-6(a) (West 2004)), seeking the reimbursement of the expenses the State had incurred as a result of Ruckman's incarceration.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.