Illinois Compiled Statutes
735 ILCS 5/1-105 (2026)
Enforcement of Act and rules
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(735 ILCS 5/1-105)
(from Ch. 110, par. 1-105)
Sec. 1-105.
Enforcement of Act and rules.
The Supreme Court may provide by rule for the orderly and expeditious
administration and enforcement of this Act and of the rules,
including the striking of pleadings, the dismissal of claims,
the entry of defaults, the assessment of costs, the assessment against
an offending party of the reasonable expenses, including attorney's
fees, which any violation causes another party to incur, or other action
that may be appropriate.
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1999–2014 · leading case: Vicencio v. Lincoln-Way Builders, Inc., 789 N.E.2d 290 (Ill. 2003).
Vicencio v. Lincoln-Way Builders, Inc., 789 N.E.2d 290 (Ill. 2003). “3, now codified at 735 ILCS 5/1-105 (West 2000). Further, the Code itself is to be liberally construed, and the "rule that statutes in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed does not apply" to the Code or to "rules made in relation thereto.”
Myers v. Bash, 778 N.E.2d 320 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 735 ILCS 5/1-105 (West 2000). By rule, deposition costs, for both discovery and evidence depositions (see 134 Ill.”
In re Marriage of Ricard, 2012 IL App (1st) 111757 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” 735 ILCS 5/1-105 (West 2008). Accordingly, these general provisions, including section 1-105 which empowers our supreme court to enact rules for the administration of the Code, are specifically applicable to all articles of the Code, including article II, the Civil Practice…”
People v. Coyne, 2014 IL App (1st) 123105 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “See 735 ILCS 5/1-105 (West 2010) (our supreme court may provide by rule for the administration and enforcement of the Code); see also In re Marriage of Ricard, 2012 IL App (1st) 111757, ¶¶ 34-35 (the doctrine of forum non conveniens set forth in Illinois Supreme Court Rule 187…”
Moline v. Vyas, 870 N.E.2d 431 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “" 735 ILCS 5/1-105 (West 2004). Supreme Court Rule 208 (134 Ill.”
Myers v. Bash (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “208, Committee Comments), shall initially be paid by the party at whose instance the deposition is taken, but "[t]he aforesaid fees and charges may in the discretion of the trial court be taxed as costs.”
Household Int'l, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing - Original Opinion filed March 02, 2001 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “" 735 ILCS 5/1-105 (West 1998). For example, under Supreme Court Rule 208(d), the expenses incurred in taking, transcribing and filing depositions may in the discretion of the trial court be taxed as costs.”
Perkins v. Harris (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “" 735 ILCS 5/1-105 (West 1996). The supreme court has provided for the assessment of costs to the prevailing party by stating the following in Supreme Court Rule 208: "(a) Who Shall Pay.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|