ILCS » Chapter 740 · Act 22
Illinois Compiled Statutes

740 ILCS 22/215 (2026)

Plenary civil no contact order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 22/215)
    Sec. 215. Plenary civil no contact order. A plenary civil no contact order shall issue if the petitioner has served notice of the hearing for that order on the respondent, in accordance with Section 209, and satisfies the requirements of this Section. The petitioner must establish that:
        (1) the court has jurisdiction under Section 206;
        (2) the requirements of Section 213 are satisfied;
        (3) a general appearance was made or filed by or for
    
the respondent or process was served on the respondent in the manner required by Section 208; and
        (4) the respondent has answered or is in default.
(Source: P.A. 93-236, eff. 1-1-04.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2026 · leading case: J.M. v. Breseno, 2011 IL App (1st) 91073 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
J.M. v. Breseno, 2011 IL App (1st) 91073 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “Petitioner then sought a plenary no-contact order under section 215 of the Act (740 ILCS 22/215 (West 2008)). ¶3 At the hearing on the plenary order Julian Portillo testified that he was a student at University of Chicago Law School and a friend of petitioner.”
JM v. Briseno, 949 N.E.2d 779 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “Petitioner then sought a plenary no-contact order under section 215 of the Act (740 ILCS 22/215 (West 2008)). At the hearing on the plenary order Julian Portillo testified that he was a student at University of Chicago Law School and a friend of petitioner.”
Nesemeier v. Zarate, 2026 IL App (4th) 250631 (Ill. App. Ct. 2026). “” The court granted respondent’s motion to reconsider but entered a plenary civil no contact order against respondent by agreement under section 215 of the Civil No Contact Order Act (Act) (740 ILCS 22/215 (West 2024)). ¶2 Petitioner appeals, asserting the court erred when it…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.