ILCS » Chapter 750 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

750 ILCS 5/706.1 (2026)

Withholding of Income to Secure Payment of Support

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 5/706.1) (from Ch. 40, par. 706.1)
    Sec. 706.1. Withholding of Income to Secure Payment of Support. Orders for support entered under this Act are subject to the Income Withholding for Support Act.
(Source: P.A. 90-18, eff. 7-1-97; 90-425, eff. 8-15-97; 90-655, eff. 7-30-98; 90-673, eff. 1-1-99; 90-790, eff. 8-14-98; 91-357, eff. 7-29-99.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1993–2011 · leading case: Dunahee v. Chenoa Welding & Fabrication, Inc., 652 N.E.2d 438 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dunahee v. Chenoa Welding & Fabrication, Inc., 652 N.E.2d 438 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). · cites it 9× “1 of the Act (750 ILCS 5/706.1 (West 1994)) supports a mandatory reading of the employer penalty provision.”
Thomas v. Diener, 814 N.E.2d 187 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 8× “A finding of a payor's nonperformance within the time required under this Act must be documented by a certified mail return receipt showing the date the income withholding notice was served on the payor.”
In Re Marriage of Chen & Ulner, 820 N.E.2d 1136 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 3× “The Support Act does not define the term “knowingly,” and, to date, there are only four cases that interpret section 35 of the Support Act (or its predecessor (750 ILCS 5/706.1 (West 1996))). Of these cases, Dunahee and Thomas, both decided by the Appellate Court, Fourth…”
Vrombaut v. Norcross Saf. Prods., L.L.C., 699 N.E.2d 155 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 5× “) 750 ILCS 5/706.1(G)(1) (West 1996). The only plausible reading of this sentence is that an employer will be penalized if it does not promptly pay over an amount withheld from an employee’s paycheck.”
In Re Marriage of Henry, 622 N.E.2d 803 (Ill. 1993). · cites it 2× “Thus, the trial court merely found that social security dependent disability benefits paid on behalf of the noncustodial parent satisfied that parent's child support obligation for the period such benefits were received, and only the method of payment, or payor, was changed.”
King v. Bradley, 829 F. Supp. 989 (N.D. Ill. 1993). · cites it 5× “SHA 750 ILCS 5/706.1(0(1). The obligee then files an affidavit which states that an NOD was served on the obligor and the obligor did not file a Petition to Stay.”
Villanueva v. O'Gara, 668 N.E.2d 589 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). · cites it 2× “” 750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(4) (West 1994); 750 ILCS 45/20(A)(4) (West 1994).”
Miller v. Miller, 643 N.E.2d 288 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). · cites it 4× “1(A)(1) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(1) (West 1992)). Both are entitled "Withholding of income to secure payment of support” and define an " 'Order for support’ ” as "any order of the court which provides for periodic payment of funds for the support of a child or maintenance…”
In re Marriage of Radzik, 2011 IL App (2d) 100374 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “The court noted that section 15(d) of the Income Withholding for Support Act (Support Act) (750 ILCS 28/15(d) (West 2000) (originally codified within the Dissolution Act and which applies to withholding income to secure support ordered under the Dissolution Act (now see 750 ILCS…”
In Re Marriage of Klomps, 676 N.E.2d 686 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “) 750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(4) (West 1992); Dodds, 222 Ill.”
Cobb v. Monarch Fin. Corp., 913 F. Supp. 1164 (N.D. Ill. 1995). “1995); Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, 750 ILCS 5/706.1(B)(l) (Supp.1995); NonSupport of Spouse and Children Act, 750 ILCS 15/4.”
Illinois Dept. of Pub. Aid Ex Rel. Jennings v. White, 675 N.E.2d 985 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “” 750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(4) (West 1994). That section of the Act is designed to "secure the payment of child support through third parties who are normally obligated to pay income to the supporting parent in the form of periodic payments.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(1) — 1 case
Miller v. Miller, 643 N.E.2d 288 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “1(A)(1) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(1) (West 1992)). Both are entitled "Withholding of income to secure payment of support” and define an " 'Order for support’ ” as "any order of the court which provides for periodic payment of funds for the support of a child or maintenance…”
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(2) — 1 case
In re Marriage of Chapman (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(4) — 3 cases
Villanueva v. O'Gara, 668 N.E.2d 589 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “” 750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(4) (West 1994); 750 ILCS 45/20(A)(4) (West 1994).”
In Re Marriage of Klomps, 676 N.E.2d 686 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “) 750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(4) (West 1992); Dodds, 222 Ill.”
Illinois Dept. of Pub. Aid Ex Rel. Jennings v. White, 675 N.E.2d 985 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “” 750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(4) (West 1994). That section of the Act is designed to "secure the payment of child support through third parties who are normally obligated to pay income to the supporting parent in the form of periodic payments.”
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(B) — 1 case
Miller v. Miller, 643 N.E.2d 288 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “1(A)(1) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(1) (West 1992)). Both are entitled "Withholding of income to secure payment of support” and define an " 'Order for support’ ” as "any order of the court which provides for periodic payment of funds for the support of a child or maintenance…”
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(B)(l) — 2 cases
Cobb v. Monarch Fin. Corp., 913 F. Supp. 1164 (N.D. Ill. 1995). “1995); Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, 750 ILCS 5/706.1(B)(l) (Supp.1995); NonSupport of Spouse and Children Act, 750 ILCS 15/4.”
King v. Bradley, 829 F. Supp. 989 (N.D. Ill. 1993). “SHA 750 ILCS 5/706.1(0(1). The obligee then files an affidavit which states that an NOD was served on the obligor and the obligor did not file a Petition to Stay.”
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(D)(l) — 1 case
King v. Bradley, 829 F. Supp. 989 (N.D. Ill. 1993). “SHA 750 ILCS 5/706.1(0(1). The obligee then files an affidavit which states that an NOD was served on the obligor and the obligor did not file a Petition to Stay.”
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(E)(2) — 1 case
King v. Bradley, 829 F. Supp. 989 (N.D. Ill. 1993). “SHA 750 ILCS 5/706.1(0(1). The obligee then files an affidavit which states that an NOD was served on the obligor and the obligor did not file a Petition to Stay.”
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(E)(l) — 1 case
King v. Bradley, 829 F. Supp. 989 (N.D. Ill. 1993). “SHA 750 ILCS 5/706.1(0(1). The obligee then files an affidavit which states that an NOD was served on the obligor and the obligor did not file a Petition to Stay.”
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(G) — 3 cases
In Re Marriage of Chen & Ulner, 820 N.E.2d 1136 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “The Support Act does not define the term “knowingly,” and, to date, there are only four cases that interpret section 35 of the Support Act (or its predecessor (750 ILCS 5/706.1 (West 1996))). Of these cases, Dunahee and Thomas, both decided by the Appellate Court, Fourth…”
Dunahee v. Chenoa Welding & Fabrication, Inc., 652 N.E.2d 438 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “1 of the Act (750 ILCS 5/706.1 (West 1994)) supports a mandatory reading of the employer penalty provision.”
In re Marriage of Chen (Ill. App. Ct. 2004).
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(G)(1) — 5 cases
Dunahee v. Chenoa Welding & Fabrication, Inc., 652 N.E.2d 438 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “1 of the Act (750 ILCS 5/706.1 (West 1994)) supports a mandatory reading of the employer penalty provision.”
Thomas v. Diener, 814 N.E.2d 187 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “A finding of a payor's nonperformance within the time required under this Act must be documented by a certified mail return receipt showing the date the income withholding notice was served on the payor.”
Vrombaut v. Norcross Saf. Prods., L.L.C., 699 N.E.2d 155 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “) 750 ILCS 5/706.1(G)(1) (West 1996). The only plausible reading of this sentence is that an employer will be penalized if it does not promptly pay over an amount withheld from an employee’s paycheck.”
Vrombaut v. Norcross Saf. Prods. (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
Thomas v. Diener (Ill. App. Ct. 2004).
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(G)(l) — 3 cases
Dunahee v. Chenoa Welding & Fabrication, Inc., 652 N.E.2d 438 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “1 of the Act (750 ILCS 5/706.1 (West 1994)) supports a mandatory reading of the employer penalty provision.”
Thomas v. Diener, 814 N.E.2d 187 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “A finding of a payor's nonperformance within the time required under this Act must be documented by a certified mail return receipt showing the date the income withholding notice was served on the payor.”
Vrombaut v. Norcross Saf. Prods., L.L.C., 699 N.E.2d 155 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “) 750 ILCS 5/706.1(G)(1) (West 1996). The only plausible reading of this sentence is that an employer will be penalized if it does not promptly pay over an amount withheld from an employee’s paycheck.”
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(J)(1)(b) — 1 case
Vrombaut v. Norcross Saf. Prods. (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(L) — 1 case
Miller v. Miller, 643 N.E.2d 288 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “1(A)(1) of the Act (750 ILCS 5/706.1(A)(1) (West 1992)). Both are entitled "Withholding of income to secure payment of support” and define an " 'Order for support’ ” as "any order of the court which provides for periodic payment of funds for the support of a child or maintenance…”
— 750 ILCS 5/706.1(d)(1)(b) — 1 case
Vrombaut v. Norcross Saf. Prods., L.L.C., 699 N.E.2d 155 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “) 750 ILCS 5/706.1(G)(1) (West 1996). The only plausible reading of this sentence is that an employer will be penalized if it does not promptly pay over an amount withheld from an employee’s paycheck.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.