Illinois Compiled Statutes

765 ILCS 1060/2 (2026)

Employee rights to inventions - conditions)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(765 ILCS 1060/2) (from Ch. 140, par. 302)
    Sec. 2. Employee rights to inventions - conditions). (1) A provision in an employment agreement which provides that an employee shall assign or offer to assign any of the employee's rights in an invention to the employer does not apply to an invention for which no equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secret information of the employer was used and which was developed entirely on the employee's own time, unless (a) the invention relates (i) to the business of the employer, or (ii) to the employer's actual or demonstrably anticipated research or development, or (b) the invention results from any work performed by the employee for the employer. Any provision which purports to apply to such an invention is to that extent against the public policy of this State and is to that extent void and unenforceable. The employee shall bear the burden of proof in establishing that his invention qualifies under this subsection.
    (2) An employer shall not require a provision made void and unenforceable by subsection (1) of this Section as a condition of employment or continuing employment. This Act shall not preempt existing common law applicable to any shop rights of employers with respect to employees who have not signed an employment agreement.
    (3) If an employment agreement entered into after January 1, 1984, contains a provision requiring the employee to assign any of the employee's rights in any invention to the employer, the employer must also, at the time the agreement is made, provide a written notification to the employee that the agreement does not apply to an invention for which no equipment, supplies, facility, or trade secret information of the employer was used and which was developed entirely on the employee's own time, unless (a) the invention relates (i) to the business of the employer, or (ii) to the employer's actual or demonstrably anticipated research or development, or (b) the invention results from any work performed by the employee for the employer.
(Source: P.A. 83-493.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: Lewis v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 678 N.E.2d 728 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1997).
Lewis v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 678 N.E.2d 728 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1997). · cites it 3× “” 765 ILCS 1060/2(1) (West 1994). By its terms, the Act does not apply to inventions relating to the employer’s business.”
765 ILCS 1060/2(1): 1 case
Lewis v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 678 N.E.2d 728 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1997). “” 765 ILCS 1060/2(1) (West 1994). By its terms, the Act does not apply to inventions relating to the employer’s business.”
765 ILCS 1060/2(3): 1 case
Lewis v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 678 N.E.2d 728 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1997). “” 765 ILCS 1060/2(1) (West 1994). By its terms, the Act does not apply to inventions relating to the employer’s business.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.