Illinois Compiled Statutes
820 ILCS 405/1100 (2026)
Review by the courts of decisions on benefits
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(820 ILCS 405/1100)
(from Ch. 48, par. 520)
Sec. 1100.
Review by the courts of decisions on benefits.
Any decision of the Board of Review (or of the Director in cases of
decisions made pursuant to Sections 800 and 801) shall be reviewable
only under and in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative
Review Law, provided that judicial review thereof shall be permitted
only after any party claiming to be aggrieved thereby has exhausted his
administrative remedies as provided by this Act. The Director shall be
deemed to have been a party to any administrative proceeding
before the Board of Review and shall be represented by the Attorney General in
any judicial action involving any such decision. The provisions of the
Administrative Review Law, and all amendments and modifications
thereof, and the rules adopted pursuant thereto, shall apply to and
govern all proceedings for the judicial review of final administrative
decisions of the Director or Board of Review hereunder. The term
"administrative decision" is defined as in Section 3-101 of the Code of
Civil Procedure.
The party aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Review (or the
decision of the Director rendered pursuant to Sections 800 and 801) may
secure judicial review thereof in the circuit court of the county in
which he resides, or in the county in which his principal place of
business is located, or if he does not reside within the State of
Illinois and has no place of business within this State, then in the
circuit court of Cook County.
Such proceedings before the courts shall be given precedence over all
other civil cases except cases arising under the Workers' Compensation
Act of this State.
The Board of Review or the Director, as the case may be, shall
certify the record of the proceedings to the circuit court and shall
prepare a true and correct typewritten copy of such testimony and a true
and correct copy of all other matters contained in such record and
certified to by the secretary thereof.
Judgments and orders of the circuit court under this Act shall be reviewed by
appeal in the same manner as in other civil cases.
The clerk of any court rendering a decision affecting or affirming
any decision of the Board of Review or of the Director, as the case may
be, shall promptly furnish the Director and the Board of Review with a
copy of such decision, without charge, and the Board of Review or the
Director, as the case may be, shall enter an order in accordance with
such decision.
(Source: P.A. 88-655, eff. 9-16-94.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58
cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 148 v. Illinois Dep't of Emp. Sec., 828 N.E.2d 1104 (Ill. 2005).
Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 148 v. Illinois Dep't of Emp. Sec., 828 N.E.2d 1104 (Ill. 2005). “The Department and CIPS note that, pursuant to section 1100 of the Unemployment Insurance Act (820 ILCS 405/1100 (West 1994)), only the “party aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Review (or the decision of the Director rendered pursuant to Sections 800 and 801) may secure…”
AFM Messenger Serv., Inc. v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 763 N.E.2d 272 (Ill. 2001). “820 ILCS 405/1100, 2205 (West 2000). Under the Administrative Review Law, the scope of judicial review extends to all questions of law and fact presented by the record before the court.”
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Aldridge, 688 N.E.2d 90 (Ill. 1997). “(West 1994); 820 ILCS 405/1100 (West 1994). The Administrative Review Law provides that our review extends to all questions of law and fact presented by the entire record.”
Van Milligen v. The Dep't of Emp. Sec., 373 Ill. App. 3d 532 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “Section 1100 of the Act (820 ILCS 405/1100 (West 2004)) expressly adopts the Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3 — 101 et seq.”
Winnebago Cnty. Citizens for Controlled Growth v. Cnty. of Winnebago, 891 N.E.2d 448 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “820 ILCS 405/1100 (West 1994). Consequently, the standing requirement limiting review to a party aggrieved by the agency's decision has been met by the members of Engineers' Union.”
Dep't of Revenue v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 827 N.E.2d 960 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “Initially, the majority declares the applicable standard of review as de novo, based on the assertion of the plaintiff agencies and the majority's determination "[g]iven *978 the procedural history of this case.”
McGaw Med. Ctr. of Nw. Univ. v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 860 N.E.2d 471 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “820 ILCS 405/1100 (West 2004); see also 735 ILCS 5/3 — 102 (West 2004) (review of a Board decision must be brought “within the time and in the manner” provided under the Review Law); Lockett v.”
Carroll v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 907 N.E.2d 16 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “The notice also listed as legal references the Unemployment Insurance Act (820 ILCS 405/1100 et seq. (West 2006)) and the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3 — 101 et seq.”
Williams v. The Dep't of Emp. Sec., 2016 IL App (1st) 142376 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Section 1100 of the Act states that "[a]ny decision of the Board of Review *** shall be reviewable only under and in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Review law" (820 ILCS 405/1100 (West 2012)). In turn, the Administrative Review Law requires, "in any action…”
Williams v. Bd. of Review, 948 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 2011). “820 ILCS 405/1100 (West 2008). Review extends to “all questions of law and fact presented by the entire record before the court.”
Lojek v. Illinois Dep't of Emp. Sec., 2013 IL App (1st) 120679 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “3d 537, 540 (2002), and citing 735 ILCS 5/3-110 (West 2004), and 820 ILCS 405/1100 (West 2004)). A court conducting administrative review will not reweigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency.”
Livingston v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 873 N.E.2d 444 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “3d 537, 540 (2002); 735 ILCS 5/3 — 110 (West 2004); 820 ILCS 405/1100 (West 2004)), are reviewed under the manifest weight of the evidence standard (Carpetland U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|