Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 11-10-8-2 (2025)

Establishment of programs; violent crime offenders

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 2. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the department shall establish a minimum security release program in which eligible committed offenders may be temporarily released from custody to:

(1) work;

(2) conduct a business or other self-employed occupation, including housekeeping or attending to family needs;

(3) attend an academic or vocational training institution or program;

(4) obtain medical, psychiatric, or psychological treatment, including treatment for drug addiction or alcoholism; or

(5) accomplish other purposes consistent with programs of the department.

     (b) An offender convicted of:

(1) a violent crime (as defined in IC 5-2-6.1-8); or

(2) a sex offense under IC 35-42-4 or IC 35-46-1-3;

is not eligible to participate in a minimum security assignment that constitutes an assignment of the offender to a program requiring weekly reporting to a designated official.

As added by Acts 1979, P.L.120, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.136-1989, SEC.2; P.L.2-1992, SEC.110; P.L.47-1993, SEC.5; P.L.144-1995, SEC.1.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1989–2017 · leading case: Hendrix v. Evans, 715 F. Supp. 897 (N.D. Ind. 1989).
Hendrix v. Evans, 715 F. Supp. 897 (N.D. Ind. 1989). · cites it 12× “Indiana Code §§ 11-10-8-2 and 11-10-8-3 are cited by the plaintiff as creating a protected right to participate in study release programs.”
Cohn v. Strawhorn, 721 N.E.2d 342 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Indiana Code § 11-10-8-2 reads in pertinent part as follows: [T]he department shall establish a minimum security release program in which eligible committed offenders may be temporarily released from custody to: (1) Work; (2) Conduct a business or other self-employed occupation…”
Paul J. Pacheco v. Keith Butts, No. 33A01-1702-MI-395 (Ind. Ct. App. July 18, 2017). · cites it 2× “To support his argument, Pacheco relies on Indiana Code Section 11-10-8-2(b)(2), which provides that sex offenders are 2 Pacheco had accrued time served of 1406 days (1246 days served prior to his release on parole and 160 days served on parole).”
Ind. Code § 11-10-8-2(b)(2): 1 case
Paul J. Pacheco v. Keith Butts, No. 33A01-1702-MI-395 (Ind. Ct. App. July 18, 2017). “To support his argument, Pacheco relies on Indiana Code Section 11-10-8-2(b)(2), which provides that sex offenders are 2 Pacheco had accrued time served of 1406 days (1246 days served prior to his release on parole and 160 days served on parole).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.