Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 22-2-6-1 (2025)
Definitions
✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Sec. 1. (a) Any direction given by an employee to an employer to make a deduction from the wages to be earned by said employee, after said direction is given, shall constitute an assignment of the wages of said employee.
(b) For the purpose of this chapter, the term "employer" shall also include the state and any political subdivision of the state.
Formerly: Acts 1945, c.183, s.1; Acts 1965, c.301, s.1. As amended by P.L.144-1986, SEC.10; P.L.143-1988, SEC.2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Design Indus., Inc. v. Cassano, 776 N.E.2d 398 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002).
Design Indus., Inc. v. Cassano, 776 N.E.2d 398 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). “He filed his Second Amended Complaint in July 2001 claiming, inter alia, that Design's failure to pay the total amount of severance constituted a violation of the Indiana Wage Statute, Indiana Code §§ 22-2-6-1 through 22-2-6-4.”
Berry v. Crawford, 990 N.E.2d 410 (Ind. 2013). “”); I.C. § 22-2-6-1(b) (“For the purpose of this chapter, the term ‘employer’ shall also include the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Matter of Holland, 21 B.R. 681 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1982). “…& Admin.News 1978, p. 5787. 6 . 11 U.S.C.A. § 524 (a)(2) (West 1979). 7 . 11 U.S.C.A. § 727 (b) (West 1979). 8 . Ind.Code Ann. § 22-2-6-1 (Burns 1974).”
Armijo v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., 285 F. Supp. 3d 1209 (D.N.M. 2018). “30 at 10 (citing Ind. Code § 22-2-6-1 ).) As FedEx points out, however, this statute is a provision of Indiana's Minimum Wage Act and is more akin to Section 50-4-2 than it is to Section 14-13-11.”
Haxton v. McClure Oil Corp., 697 N.E.2d 1277 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998). “In support of this argument, she contends the Agreement constitutes an assignment of wages in violation of Indiana Code Section 22-2-6-1, which states: Any direction given by an employee to an employer to make a deduction from the wages to be earned by said employee, after said…”
Neely v. Facility Concepts, Inc., 274 F. Supp. 3d 851 (S.D. Ind. 2017). “2011), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in determining whether a particular type of com *859 pensation was considered a “wage” under the IWPS, explained as follows: Indiana’s Wage Payment Statute, Ind. Code § 22-2-6-1 et seq., requires employers to pay their employees’…”
Walczak v. Labor Works-fort Wayne, LLC, 966 N.E.2d 642 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “) (the Wage Payment Statute) and I.C. § 22-2-6-1 et seq. (West, Westlaw through end of 2011 1st Regular Sess.”
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc., No. 1:17-cv-04439 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 17, 2020). “CODE § 22-2-6-1 et seq. Duvall contends that those illegal deductions resulted in Defendants’ failure to pay her the “amount due” in violation of Indiana’s wage payment statute, IND.”
Michael A. Patton v. Stardust Transp., LLC, No. 49A05-1402-PL-59 (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 13, 2015). “Ind. Code § 22-2-6-1 (a) (emphasis added).”
Anderson Fed'n of Teachers v. Rokita, 546 F. Supp. 3d 733 (S.D. Ind. 2021). “CODE § 22-2-6-1(a). "Employer" in this context "include[s] the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Anderson Fed'n of Teachers v. Rokita, 666 F. Supp. 3d 789 (S.D. Ind. 2023). “CODE § 22-2-6-1(a). "Employer" in this context "include[s] the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Tim Berry v. William Crawford, No. 49S00-1201-PL-53 and 49S00-1202-PL-76 (Ind. June 18, 2013). “”); I.C. § 22-2-6-1(b) (“For the purpose of this chapter, the term ‘employer’ shall also include the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Ind. Code § 22-2-6-1(a): 3 cases
Anderson Fed'n of Teachers v. Rokita, 546 F. Supp. 3d 733 (S.D. Ind. 2021). “CODE § 22-2-6-1(a). "Employer" in this context "include[s] the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Anderson Fed'n of Teachers v. Rokita, 666 F. Supp. 3d 789 (S.D. Ind. 2023). “CODE § 22-2-6-1(a). "Employer" in this context "include[s] the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Duvall v. Cardon & Assocs., Inc., No. 1:17-cv-04439 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 17, 2020). “CODE § 22-2-6-1 et seq. Duvall contends that those illegal deductions resulted in Defendants’ failure to pay her the “amount due” in violation of Indiana’s wage payment statute, IND.”
Ind. Code § 22-2-6-1(b): 4 cases
Berry v. Crawford, 990 N.E.2d 410 (Ind. 2013). “”); I.C. § 22-2-6-1(b) (“For the purpose of this chapter, the term ‘employer’ shall also include the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Tim Berry v. William Crawford, No. 49S00-1201-PL-53 and 49S00-1202-PL-76 (Ind. June 18, 2013). “”); I.C. § 22-2-6-1(b) (“For the purpose of this chapter, the term ‘employer’ shall also include the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Anderson Fed'n of Teachers v. Rokita, 546 F. Supp. 3d 733 (S.D. Ind. 2021). “CODE § 22-2-6-1(a). "Employer" in this context "include[s] the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Anderson Fed'n of Teachers v. Rokita, 666 F. Supp. 3d 789 (S.D. Ind. 2023). “CODE § 22-2-6-1(a). "Employer" in this context "include[s] the state and any political subdivision of the state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.