Ind. Code » Title 22
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 22-3-3-5.2 (2025)

Billing review service standards

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 5.2. (a) A billing review service shall adhere to the following requirements to determine the pecuniary liability of an employer or an employer's insurance carrier for a specific service or product covered under worker's compensation provided before July 1, 2014, by all medical service providers, and after June 30, 2014, by a medical service provider that is not a medical service facility:

(1) The formation of a billing review standard, and any subsequent analysis or revision of the standard, must use data that is based on the medical service provider billing charges as submitted to the employer and the employer's insurance carrier from the same community. This subdivision does not apply when a unique or specialized service or product does not have sufficient comparative data to allow for a reasonable comparison.

(2) Data used to determine pecuniary liability must be compiled on or before June 30 and December 31 of each year.

(3) Billing review standards must be revised for prospective future payments of medical service provider bills to provide for payment of the charges at a rate not more than the charges made by eighty percent (80%) of the medical service providers during the prior six (6) months within the same community. The data used to perform the analysis and revision of the billing review standards may not be more than two (2) years old and must be periodically updated by a representative inflationary or deflationary factor. Reimbursement for these charges may not exceed the actual charge invoiced by the medical service provider.

     (b) This subsection applies after June 30, 2014, to a medical service facility. The pecuniary liability of an employer or an employer's insurance carrier for a specific service or product covered under worker's compensation and provided by a medical service facility is equal to a reasonable amount, which is established by payment of one (1) of the following:

(1) The amount negotiated at any time between the medical service facility and any of the following:

(A) The employer.

(B) The employer's insurance carrier.

(C) A billing review service on behalf of a person described in clause (A) or (B).

(D) A direct provider network that has contracted with a person described in clause (A) or (B).

(2) Two hundred percent (200%) of the amount that would be paid to the medical service facility on the same date for the same service or product under the medical service facility's Medicare reimbursement rate, if, after conducting the negotiations described in subdivision (1), an agreement has not been reached.

     (c) A medical service provider may request an explanation from a billing review service if the medical service provider's bill has been reduced as a result of application of the eightieth percentile or of a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) or Medicare coding change. The request must be made not later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the notice of the reduction. If a request is made, the billing review service must provide:

(1) the name of the billing review service used to make the reduction;

(2) the dollar amount of the reduction;

(3) the dollar amount of the service or product at the eightieth percentile; and

(4) in the case of a CPT or Medicare coding change, the basis upon which the change was made;

not later than thirty (30) days after the date of the request.

     (d) If, after a hearing, the worker's compensation board finds that a billing review service used a billing review standard that did not comply with subsection (a)(1) through (a)(3), as applicable, in determining the pecuniary liability of an employer or an employer's insurance carrier for a medical service provider's charge for services or products covered under worker's compensation, the worker's compensation board may assess a civil penalty against the billing review service in an amount not less than one hundred dollars ($100) and not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).

As added by P.L.216-1995, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.202-2001, SEC.4; P.L.275-2013, SEC.5; P.L.99-2014, SEC.2; P.L.160-2022, SEC.2.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2009 · leading case: Washington Twp. Fire Dep't v. Beltway Surgery Ctr., 911 N.E.2d 590 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Washington Twp. Fire Dep't v. Beltway Surgery Ctr., 911 N.E.2d 590 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 8× “Washington Township also contends that placing the burden on employers to prove how a billing review service reached its pecuniary liability determination is inconsistent with subsection (b) of Indiana Code Section 22-3-3-5.2, which states: A medical service provider may request…”
Christopher R. Brown v. Decatur Cnty. Mem'l Hosp., 892 N.E.2d 642 (Ind. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 22-3-3-5.2. The Act thus establishes a collection system different from that available to healthcare providers outside the worker's compensation system.”
Ind. Code § 22-3-3-5.2(a): 1 case
Washington Twp. Fire Dep't v. Beltway Surgery Ctr., 911 N.E.2d 590 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). “Washington Township also contends that placing the burden on employers to prove how a billing review service reached its pecuniary liability determination is inconsistent with subsection (b) of Indiana Code Section 22-3-3-5.2, which states: A medical service provider may request…”
Ind. Code § 22-3-3-5.2(b): 1 case
Washington Twp. Fire Dep't v. Beltway Surgery Ctr., 911 N.E.2d 590 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). “Washington Township also contends that placing the burden on employers to prove how a billing review service reached its pecuniary liability determination is inconsistent with subsection (b) of Indiana Code Section 22-3-3-5.2, which states: A medical service provider may request…”
Ind. Code § 22-3-3-5.2(c): 1 case
Washington Twp. Fire Dep't v. Beltway Surgery Ctr., 911 N.E.2d 590 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). “Washington Township also contends that placing the burden on employers to prove how a billing review service reached its pecuniary liability determination is inconsistent with subsection (b) of Indiana Code Section 22-3-3-5.2, which states: A medical service provider may request…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.