Ind. Code » Title 22
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 22-3-4-7 (2025)

Disputes; administrative review

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 7. If an application for review is made to the board within thirty (30) days from the date of the award made by less than all the members, the full board, if the first hearing was not held before the full board, shall review the evidence, or, if deemed advisable, hear the parties at issue, their representatives, and witnesses as soon as practicable and shall make an award and file the same with the finding of the facts on which it is based and send a copy thereof to each of the parties in dispute, in like manner as specified in section 6 of this chapter.

Formerly: Acts 1929, c.172, s.60; Acts 1969, c.94, s.6. As amended by P.L.144-1986, SEC.44; P.L.258-1997(ss), SEC.9.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases, 1976–2016 · leading case: Noblesville Casting Div. of TRW, Inc. v. Prince, 438 N.E.2d 722 (Ind. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Noblesville Casting Div. of TRW, Inc. v. Prince, 438 N.E.2d 722 (Ind. 1982). · cites it 4× “See Ind. Code § 22-3-4-7 (Burns 1974). Following a hearing on the matter, the Full Industrial Board affirmed the award as entered by the hearing officer.”
Rork v. Szabo Foods, 436 N.E.2d 64 (Ind. 1982). · cites it 6× “See Ind.Code § 22-3-4-7 (Burns 1974). A hearing was conducted before the Full Board, wherein both parties appeared by counsel and presented arguments to the Board.”
Jackson v. Cigna/Ford Elec. & Refrigeration Corp., 677 N.E.2d 1098 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 6× “Accordingly, the question of whether the premature filing of an application for review by the full worker’s compensation board satisfies the filing requirements of Ind.Code § 22-3-4-7 is one of first impression in Indiana.”
Dial X-Automated Equip. v. Caskey, 826 N.E.2d 642 (Ind. 2005). · cites it 4× “Full Board Adoption of Single Hearing Member Findings Although not challenged on appeal by Dial-X, a majority of the Court of Appeals panel opined that, by adopting without comment the decision of the single hearing member, the decision of the full board was inconsistent with…”
Talas v. Correct Piping Co., 435 N.E.2d 22 (Ind. 1982). · cites it 2× “behalf, and/or whether they were charges as prevailed in the same community for similar services to injured persons of the like standard of living when such services are paid for by the injured person; further, Talas did not prove to the satisfaction of this *26 Board that any…”
Perez v. United States Steel Corp., 428 N.E.2d 212 (Ind. 1981). · cites it 2× “The findings made by the Board, as a quasi-judicial body, are “conclusive and binding as to all questions of the fact.”
Pavese v. Cleaning Solutions, 894 N.E.2d 570 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 22-3-4-7 (“the full board ... shall make an award and file the same with the finding of the facts on which it is based and send a copy thereof to each of the parties in dispute.”
Stytle v. Angola Die Casting Co., 783 N.E.2d 316 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “We, therefore, reverse the Board's dismissal of Stytle's application and remand with instructions to enter findings which comply with Indiana Code Section 22-3-4-7. Reversed and remanded with instructions.”
Wayman v. J & S Petroleum, Inc., 694 N.E.2d 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “Ind.Code § 22-3-4-7; Schreiber v. Rickert, 114 Ind.”
Bd. of Commissioners of Henry Cnty. v. Dudley, 340 N.E.2d 808 (Ind. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “, 1974) provides that if the defendant sustains the burden of proving the affirmative of both these issues no compensation shall be allowed.”
Vandenberg v. Snedegar Constr., Inc., 911 N.E.2d 681 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 22-3-4-7 ('the full board ... shall make an award and file the same with the finding of the facts on which it is based"); Dial X-Automated Equip.”
Bogdon v. Ramada Inn, Inc., 415 N.E.2d 767 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981). “Ind.Code 22-3-4-7 requires the filing of the Form 16 application for review before the Board within twenty days after the award entered by the single hearing member.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.