Sec. 1. (a) A person may not refuse to sell or to rent
after the making of a bona fide offer, refuse to negotiate for the sale or
rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny a dwelling to any
person because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, disability,
or national origin.
(b) A person may not discriminate against any person in the terms,
conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in providing
services or facilities in connection with the sale or rental of a dwelling,
because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, disability, or
national origin.
(c) This section does not prohibit discrimination against a person
because the person has been convicted under federal law or the law of
any state of the illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled
substance.
As added by P.L.66-1990, SEC.2. Amended by P.L.23-1993,
SEC.141.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1993–2019 · leading case:
State v. INI, 716 N.E.2d 943 (Ind. 1999).
State v. INI, 716 N.E.2d 943 (Ind. 1999).
· cites it 2× “On April 12, 1996, the Commission issued its notice of findings stating that there was evidence to support the charge of discrimination based on familial status in violation of Indiana Code § 22-9.5-5-1. On April 19, Baker filed a notice of election to have the issue decided in…”
State, Civil Rights Comm'n ex rel. Belzer v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc., 702 N.E.2d 370 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 2× “Ind.Code § 22-9.5-5-1. The Act further prohibits the making, printing, or publishing of any notice, statement, or advertisement concerning the sale or rental of a dwelling which indicates any preference, limitation, or discrimination based upon familial status.”
Peter Odongo v. Edward Rose of Indiana, LLC, No. 18A-MI-2997 (Ind. Ct. App. May 10, 2019).
“Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-MI-2997 | May 10, 2019 Page 3 of 8 violations of the Indianapolis noise ordinance, “Tortious Invasion of Privacy Entering Apartment,” “Tortious Uninhabitable Living Air Quality Conditions,” violations of Indiana Code sections…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.