Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 23-18-4-13 (2025)

Policy

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 13. The policy of this article is to give the maximum effect to the principle of freedom of contract and to the enforceability of operating agreements of limited liability companies.

As added by P.L.40-2013, SEC.9.

 

IC 23-18-5Chapter 5. Finance

 

           23-18-5-1Promises to contribute property or services; enforceability
           23-18-5-2Obligation to make capital contribution or other payment; compromise; effect; remedies or consequences of nonpayment
           23-18-5-3Allocation of profits and losses
           23-18-5-4Shared distributions of cash or other assets
           23-18-5-5Dissociation; companies existing on or before June 30, 1999
           23-18-5-5.1Dissociation; companies formed after June 30, 1999
           23-18-5-6Distributions
           23-18-5-7Unlawful distributions; liability
           23-18-5-8Distributions in kind
           23-18-5-9Status of member entitled to receive distribution

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2024–2025 · leading case: Andrew Nemeth Props., LLC v. William A Panzica, 234 N.E.3d 183 (Ind. Ct. App. 2024).
Andrew Nemeth Props., LLC v. William A Panzica, 234 N.E.3d 183 (Ind. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “And considering that the Act’s stated policy is, in part, “to give the maximum effect to the principle of freedom of contract,” Ind. Code § 23-18-4-13 , we see no reason why a pre-formation oral contract cannot be the means of establishing that membership.”
Andrew Nemeth Props., LLC v. William A. Panzica, 271 N.E.3d 1100 (Ind. 2025). · cites it 2× “Given the Act’s stated policy of giving “maximum effect to the principle of freedom of contract,” I.C. § 23-18-4-13, the court held that a pre-formation oral contract can establish initial membership, Andrew Nemeth Props.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.