Ind. Code » Title 24
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 24-1-1-5 (2025)

Civil suit for damages

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 5. Any person or persons or corporations that may be injured or damaged by any such arrangement, contract, agreement, trust, or combination described in section 1 of this chapter may sue for and recover in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state, of any person, persons, or corporation operating such trust or combination, the full consideration or sum paid by him or them for any goods, wares, merchandise, or articles, the sale of which is controlled by such combination or trust.

Formerly: Acts 1897, c.104, s.5. As amended by P.L.152-1986, SEC.4.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2024 · leading case: In Re Wiring Device Antitrust Litig., 498 F. Supp. 79 (E.D.N.Y 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Wiring Device Antitrust Litig., 498 F. Supp. 79 (E.D.N.Y 1980). “There is no precedent for the extraordinary penalty Robinette claims that the South Carolina statute imposes. Five other states have enacted statutes which permit the recovery of the full purchase price of goods sold in connection with antitrust violations.”
Robinette Hardware Co. v. Square D Co., 498 F. Supp. 79 (E.D.N.Y 1980). “There is no precedent for the extraordinary penalty Robinette claims that the South Carolina statute imposes. Five other states have enacted statutes which permit the recovery of the full purchase price of goods sold in connection with antitrust vio *87 lations.”
Connecticut v. Sandoz, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-00802, 2024 WL 4753308 (D. Conn. Nov. 12, 2024). “3 The Defendants next argue that under its antitrust statute, Indiana is not authorized to sue on behalf of indirect purchasers other than governmental entities, citing Ind. Code § 24-1-1-5 .1 (“The attorney general may bring an action on behalf of the state or a political…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.