Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 28-9-5-3 (2025)

Interpleader

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 3. This article does not prevent a depository financial institution from interpleading and paying the funds that are the subject of an adverse claim into a court. If a depository financial institution pays the funds to the court, the depository financial institution is entitled to recover and collect the costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the depository financial institution in the interpleader action.

As added by P.L.258-1989, SEC.2.

 

IC 28-10ARTICLE 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS

 

           Ch. 1.General Provisions
           Ch. 2.LIBOR Discontinuance and Replacement
           Ch. 3.Reporting of Reportable Cyber Incidents

 

IC 28-10-1Chapter 1. General Provisions

 

           28-10-1-1References to federal laws or regulations
           28-10-1-2Applicability of definitions
           28-10-1-3"Corporation" defined
           28-10-1-4"Corporation" defined

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2007 · leading case: Porter Dev., LLC v. First Nat'l Bank of Valparaiso, 866 N.E.2d 775 (Ind. 2007).
Porter Dev., LLC v. First Nat'l Bank of Valparaiso, 866 N.E.2d 775 (Ind. 2007). · cites it 12× “When a financial institution interpleads and pays into court deposited funds that are subject to an adverse claim, how does Indiana Code § 28-9-5-3 govern its entitlement to receive its costs and expenses thereby incurred? To address this question, we granted transfer.”
Porter Dev., LLC v. First Nat'l Bank of Valparaiso, 837 N.E.2d 558 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 29× “On Cross-Appeal, First National raises one issue, which we restate as: Whether the trial court erred in finding that First National was not entitled to recover costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, pursuant to Ind.Code § 28-9-5-3. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.