Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 29-3-10-1 (2025)

Payment of debts incurred on behalf of protected person; payment of claims; actions against guardian; filing of claims

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 1. (a) Without prior order of the court, a guardian shall pay from the guardianship property all indebtedness that the guardian has reasonably incurred in good faith on behalf of the protected person.

     (b) Upon order of the court, a guardian shall pay from the protected person's property for which the guardian is responsible any claim against the protected person or the protected person's property, that the court determines has merit.

     (c) Claims based on:

(1) contracts entered into by a guardian in the guardian's official capacity;

(2) obligations arising from ownership or control of the property for which the guardian is responsible; or

(3) acts or omissions in the course of administration of the guardianship;

may be asserted against the guardianship by proceeding against the guardian in the guardian's official capacity, whether or not the guardian is personally liable.

     (d) Any person having a claim against the protected person or the protected person's property or against the guardian as such may file the claim with the court at any time before the claim is barred by the statute of limitations and, upon proof of the claim, procure an order for its allowance and payment from the guardianship property. However, if a claim is filed within sixty (60) days before the date that a protected person attains the age of majority or regains capacity:

(1) the claim shall be stayed until the sixty (60) day period has elapsed;

(2) the protected person shall be substituted as a party; and

(3) the guardian shall prepare and file the guardian's account without regard to the claim.

As added by P.L.169-1988, SEC.1.

 

IC 29-3-11Chapter 11. Liability of Guardians and Persons Acting Under Protective Orders

 

           29-3-11-1Protection for persons dealing in good faith with guardian or person acting under protective order; scope of protection
           29-3-11-2Contracts entered into in good faith; personal liability of guardian; liability for acts or omissions; proceeding to determine liability
           29-3-11-3Actions between third party and protected person; service of process; suits against guardian or person acting under protective order; substitution of parties
           29-3-11-4Civil immunity of a guardian

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1999–2019 · leading case: Est. of Prickett v. Womersley, 905 N.E.2d 1008 (Ind. 2009).
Est. of Prickett v. Womersley, 905 N.E.2d 1008 (Ind. 2009). “§ 29-3-10-1. 4 . Contrary to our colleagues, we do not find a claimant having paid bills and debts on a decedent's behalf to be a recognized exception to the presumption that a family member's services are rendered gratuitously.”
Est. of Prickett v. Womersley, 885 N.E.2d 619 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “In support of its claim, the Estate directs us to Indiana Code section 29-3-10-1, which provides that (b) Upon order of the court, a guardian shall pay from the protected person’s property for which the guardian is responsible any claim against the protected person’s property,…”
Williamson v. Williamson, 714 N.E.2d 1270 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). “He also argues that Donald was not entitled to pay himself any such fee after the guardianship was closed.”
Thomas Meranda v. Mary Elizabeth Spaw, No. 19A-GU-1218 (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 26, 2019). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 29-3-10-1(d). The statute does not require, nor have we found any authority, statutory or otherwise, that provides that a claim must be filed on the interim accounting that covers the period in which the claim arose.”
Williamson v. Williamson, No. 22A01-9808-CV-319 (Ind. Aug. 20, 1999). “He also argues that Donald was not entitled to pay himself any such fee after the guardianship was closed. It is true that the guardian of a ward's estate has a duty to pay all just debts due from the ward out of the estate in his hands.”
Ind. Code § 29-3-10-1(d): 1 case
Thomas Meranda v. Mary Elizabeth Spaw, No. 19A-GU-1218 (Ind. Ct. App. Dec. 26, 2019). “” I.C. § 29-3-10-1(d). The statute does not require, nor have we found any authority, statutory or otherwise, that provides that a claim must be filed on the interim accounting that covers the period in which the claim arose.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.