Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 31-14-20-2 (2025)

Failure to register; effect on parental rights in adoption proceedings

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 2. (a) A man who fails to register with the putative father registry as required by section 1 of this chapter waives the right to notice of an adoption of a child who is the subject of the paternity action:

(1) if the adoption is filed before the man establishes paternity; and

(2) in which the child's mother does not disclose to an attorney or agency arranging the adoption the name or address of the child's putative father.

     (b) A waiver under this section constitutes the man's irrevocably implied consent to the child's adoption.

[Pre-1997 Recodification Citation: 31-6-6.1-2(e).]

As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.6.

 

IC 31-14-21Chapter 21. Requirements When Adoption Pending for Child Who Is Subject of Paternity Action

 

           31-14-21-1Applicability of IC 31-14-21-1 through IC 31-14-21-7
           31-14-21-2Nonapplicability of IC 31-14-21-1 through IC 31-14-21-7
           31-14-21-3Putative father's notice of paternity action; notice to attorney or agency in adoption proceedings
           31-14-21-4Putative father's notice of paternity action; notice to clerk having jurisdiction over adoption
           31-14-21-5Content of notice
           31-14-21-6Failure to provide notice; intervention by adoptive parents
           31-14-21-7Failure to provide notice; vacation of paternity determination; intervention by adoptive parents
           31-14-21-8Intervention by adoptive parents; purposes of intervention; objections to errors in paternity proceedings
           31-14-21-9Duty of court with jurisdiction to establish paternity within period prescribed by chapter
           31-14-21-9.1Duty of court to order blood or genetic testing
           31-14-21-9.2Final hearing to determine paternity and ruling
           31-14-21-10Repealed
           31-14-21-11Repealed
           31-14-21-12Repealed
           31-14-21-13Stay proceedings in paternity action

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case: Walker v. Campbell, 711 N.E.2d 42 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999).
Walker v. Campbell, 711 N.E.2d 42 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 7× “CODE § 31-14-20-2 goes beyond the putative father registry's primary purpose of prescribing the procedures of providing notice by pronouncing that a putative father's failure to register will work the forfeiture of his parental rights in adoption proceedings as follows: (a) A…”
In Re Paternity of Baby Doe, 734 N.E.2d 281 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “[4] However, if a putative father does not register within the required 30 days, the putative father is not entitled to notice of the adoption.”
Mathews v. Hansen, 797 N.E.2d 1168 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “Today we are called upon to construe the provisions of Indiana Code sections 31-14-20-2 and 81-19-4-6 regarding a man's duty to register as a putative father.”
In the Matter of Adoption Petition of Romero, 2006-NMCA-136, 145 P.3d 98. “2000) (quoting Ind.Code § 31-14-20-2 (1997)). Our statutes have no comparable provisions.”
Helen G. v. Mark Jh, 145 P.3d 98 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). “2000) (quoting Ind.Code § 31-14-20-2 (1997)). Our statutes have no comparable provisions.”
Jones v. Maple, 734 N.E.2d 281 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “” Ind.Code § 31-14-20-2. 6 Further, a putative father whose consent to adoption is implied is not entitled to either challenge the validity of his implied consent or establish paternity.”
M S v. J a, No. 24A-AD-02302 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 17, 2025). · cites it 2× “Indiana Code section 31-14-20-2 indicates a man who fails to register with the Registry as required by section 1 waives his right to notice of an adoption petition regarding the child at issue in the paternity action if the adoption is filed before the establishment of paternity…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.