Sec. 2. (a) A man who fails to register with the
putative father registry as required by section 1 of this chapter waives
the right to notice of an adoption of a child who is the subject of the
paternity action:
(1) if the adoption is filed before the man establishes paternity;
and
(2) in which the child's mother does not disclose to an attorney or
agency arranging the adoption the name or address of the child's
putative father.
(b) A waiver under this section constitutes the man's irrevocably
implied consent to the child's adoption.
[Pre-1997 Recodification Citation: 31-6-6.1-2(e).]
As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.6.
IC 31-14-21Chapter 21. Requirements When Adoption Pending for Child Who
Is Subject of Paternity Action
31-14-21-3Putative father's notice of paternity action; notice
to attorney or agency in adoption proceedings 31-14-21-4Putative father's notice of paternity action; notice
to clerk having jurisdiction over adoption 31-14-21-6Failure to provide notice; intervention by
adoptive parents 31-14-21-7Failure to provide notice; vacation of paternity
determination; intervention by adoptive parents 31-14-21-8Intervention by adoptive parents; purposes of
intervention; objections to errors in paternity
proceedings 31-14-21-9Duty of court with jurisdiction to establish
paternity within period prescribed by chapter
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case:
Walker v. Campbell, 711 N.E.2d 42 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999).
Walker v. Campbell, 711 N.E.2d 42 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 7× “CODE § 31-14-20-2 goes beyond the putative father registry's primary purpose of prescribing the procedures of providing notice by pronouncing that a putative father's failure to register will work the forfeiture of his parental rights in adoption proceedings as follows: (a) A…”
In Re Paternity of Baby Doe, 734 N.E.2d 281 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000).
· cites it 4× “[4] However, if a putative father does not register within the required 30 days, the putative father is not entitled to notice of the adoption.”
Mathews v. Hansen, 797 N.E.2d 1168 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 3× “Today we are called upon to construe the provisions of Indiana Code sections 31-14-20-2 and 81-19-4-6 regarding a man's duty to register as a putative father.”
Helen G. v. Mark Jh, 145 P.3d 98 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006).
“2000) (quoting Ind.Code § 31-14-20-2 (1997)). Our statutes have no comparable provisions.”
Jones v. Maple, 734 N.E.2d 281 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000).
· cites it 4× “” Ind.Code § 31-14-20-2. 6 Further, a putative father whose consent to adoption is implied is not entitled to either challenge the validity of his implied consent or establish paternity.”
M S v. J a, No. 24A-AD-02302 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 17, 2025).
· cites it 2× “Indiana Code section 31-14-20-2 indicates a man who fails to register with the Registry as required by section 1 waives his right to notice of an adoption petition regarding the child at issue in the paternity action if the adoption is filed before the establishment of paternity…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.