Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 31-40-1-1 (2025)

Application of article

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 1. This article applies to costs paid by the department, the department of correction, and counties under this chapter, including costs resulting from the institutional placement of a child adjudicated a delinquent child or a child in need of services.

[Pre-1997 Recodification Citation: 31-6-4-18(a).]

As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.23. Amended by P.L.146-2008, SEC.663; P.L.204-2011, SEC.2.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2003–2009 · leading case: Indiana Fam. & Soc. Servs. Admin. v. Henry Cnty. Off. of Fam. & Child., 790 N.E.2d 155 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003).
Indiana Fam. & Soc. Servs. Admin. v. Henry Cnty. Off. of Fam. & Child., 790 N.E.2d 155 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Ind.Code § 31-40-1-1 explains that Article 40 of Title 31 of the Indiana Code "applies to a financial burden sustained by a county as the result of costs paid by the county under section 2 of this chapter, including costs resulting from the institutional placement of a child…”
Indiana Dep't of Child Servs. v. B.B., 912 N.E.2d 909 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Article 40 of Title 31 applies to costs paid by DCS, "including costs resulting from the institutional placement of a child adjudicated a delinquent child or a [CHINS]" IC. § 31-40-1-1. On January 1, 2009, Public Law 146-2008 went into effect, amending portions of Indiana Code…”
In re JJ, 912 N.E.2d 909 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “" I.C. § 31-40-1-1. On January 1, 2009, Public Law 146-2008 went into effect, amending portions of Indiana Code 31-40.”
In re Kja, 790 N.E.2d 155 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “The Division claims the trial court's order violates Ind.Code § 31-40-1-1. [3] We review the construction of statutes de novo, giving no deference to the trial court's interpretation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.