Ind. Code » Title 32
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 32-18-2-1 (2026)

Applicability of chapter

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 1. (a) This chapter applies to all transfers made and obligations incurred after June 30, 1994.

     (b) This chapter does not apply to a transfer made or an obligation incurred before July 1, 1994.

[Pre-2002 Recodification Citation: 32-2-7-1.]

As added by P.L.2-2002, SEC.3.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: Lei Shi v. Cecilia Yi, 921 N.E.2d 31 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lei Shi v. Cecilia Yi, 921 N.E.2d 31 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “The issue is whether the trial court erred in granting Enterprise's motions to dismiss and for summary judgment as the cause of action relates to Enterprise. Initially, we note that although Shi brought a complaint containing two counts, the two counts are both governed by the…”
Hoesman v. Sheffler, 886 N.E.2d 622 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “Ind.Code § 32-18-2-1. However, Indiana’s Fraudulent Transfers Act indicates that "[u]n-less superseded by this chapter, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, equitable subordination, estoppel, laches, fraud,…”
Weintraut v. Comm'r, 2016 T.C. Memo. 142 (Tax Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “After 2002, the Indiana UFTA was placed in another section of the Indiana Code, namely, Ind. Code Ann. secs.”
Dfs Secured Healthcare Receivables Trust v. Caregivers Great Lakes, Inc. & Marc Leestma, 384 F.3d 338 (7th Cir. 2004). “This appeal involves a state law claim under Indiana’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (IUFTA), Ind.Code §§ 32-18-2-1 et seq. It has long been argued by some that diversity jurisdiction should be limited or even abolished.”
Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Symons, 817 F.3d 979 (7th Cir. 2016). “fer Act Moving beyond the contract claims, the judge found' the defendants liable for fraudulent transfer under the Indiana Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Ind.Code §§ 32-18-2-1 et seq. Broadly speaking, the IUFTA prevents a party from transferring assets in order to defraud a…”
Glentel, Inc. v. Wireless Ventures, LLC, 362 F. Supp. 2d 992 (N.D. Ind. 2005). · cites it 2× “Glentel’s Claim of Fraudulent Conveyance Fails The Indiana Fraudulent Transfer Act, Ind.Code § 32-18-2-1 to 21, provides that “[a] transfer made .”
Lee v. Walro (In re Lee), 567 B.R. 802 (S.D. Ind. 2017). · cites it 2× “§ 544 (a)(1) and the Indiana Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Ind. Code §§ 32-18-2-1 et seq. It then concluded that the Trustee was entitled to recover certain property and a total of $3,755,785.”
Vukadinovich v. Posner (N.D. Ind. 2023). · cites it 4× “DISCUSSION The Motion cites Indiana’s Fraudulent Transfers Act, Ind. Code § 32-18-2-1 et seq., and Indiana’s prejudgment attachment statute, Ind.”
Princeton Alt. Income Fund LP v. Wolfe (N.D. Ind. 2024). · cites it 4× “It includes claims against Defendants for actual and constructive fraudulent conveyances of Raviv’s interest in certain real property (“Vernon Woods Property”) to his wife, Katherine, in violation of the Indiana Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Ind. Code §§ 32-18-2-1 et seq.…”
Karleen Spann Perry v. Larry Spann, & Madison Riverport, LLC c/o Anthony Hammock (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Perry also 1 Perry sought to have other transactions – not involving Madison Riverport – declared void as being in violation of the Indiana Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Ind. Code § 32-18-2-1 et seq. See Appellant’s Appendix Vol.”
Princeton Alt. Income Fund LP v. Wolfe (N.D. Ind. 2022). · cites it 2× “It included claims against Defendants for actual and constructive fraudulent conveyances of his interest in certain real property (“Vernon Woods Property”) by Raviv to his wife, Katherine Wolfe, in violation of the Indiana Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Ind. Code §§ 32-18-2-1…”
Nat'l Asset Consultants LLC v. Midwest Holdings-indianapolis, LLC (S.D. Ind. 2021). · cites it 2× “While they point to prior business dealings among the parties to the short sale of the Property, they have not shown that the transactions were fraudulent under the Indiana Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Ind. Code § 32-18-2-1 et seq. Indeed, their briefs do not invoke that Act.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.