Sec. 4. (a) A professional health care provider under
investigation shall be permitted at any time to see any records
accumulated by a peer review committee pertaining to the provider's
personal practice.
(b) The provider shall be offered the opportunity to appear before
the peer review committee with adequate representation to hear all
charges and findings concerning the provider's practice and to offer
rebuttal information.
(c) The rebuttal information shall be a part of the record before any
disclosure of the charges and findings under this chapter is made.
[Pre-1998 Recodification Citation: 34-4-12.6-2(d).]
As added by P.L.1-1998, SEC.26.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 2001–2026 · leading case:
Mattice v. Mem'l Hosp., 203 F.R.D. 381 (N.D. Ind. 2001).
Mattice v. Mem'l Hosp., 203 F.R.D. 381 (N.D. Ind. 2001).
· cites it 4× “” Ind.Code § 34-30-15-4(a). Also, “[information that is otherwise discoverable or admissible from original sources is not immune from discovery or use in any proceeding merely because it was presented during proceedings before a peer review committee.”
Savage, No. 1:25-cv-01285 (S.D. Ind. Apr. 27, 2026).
· cites it 3× “" Ind. Code § 34-30-15-4 (a). As noted above, Savage does not concede IU Health conducted a peer review proceeding or performed any kind of investigation of the claim against him.”
Lin v. Franciscan All., Inc., No. 4:21-cv-00057 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 20, 2023).
· cites it 2× “Ind. Code § 34-30-15-4 (“[A] professional health care provider under investigation shall be permitted at any time to see the records accumulated by a peer review committee pertaining to the provider’s personal practice.”
Bonzani v. Goshen Health Sys. Inc, No. 3:19-cv-00586 (N.D. Ind. July 5, 2022).
“§ 34-30-15-4. The parties here dispute the scope of this provider exception based upon the phrases “under investigation” and “at any time” in the statute.”
Ind. Code § 34-30-15-4(a): 2 cases
Mattice v. Mem'l Hosp., 203 F.R.D. 381 (N.D. Ind. 2001).
“” Ind.Code § 34-30-15-4(a). Also, “[information that is otherwise discoverable or admissible from original sources is not immune from discovery or use in any proceeding merely because it was presented during proceedings before a peer review committee.”
Savage, No. 1:25-cv-01285 (S.D. Ind. Apr. 27, 2026).
“" Ind. Code § 34-30-15-4 (a). As noted above, Savage does not concede IU Health conducted a peer review proceeding or performed any kind of investigation of the claim against him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.