Sec. 3. The supreme court has authority to adopt,
amend, and rescind rules of court that govern and control practice and
procedure in all the courts of Indiana. These rules must be promulgated
and take effect under the rules adopted by the supreme court, and
thereafter all laws in conflict with the supreme court's rules have no
further force or effect.
[Pre-1998 Recodification Citation: 34-5-2-1 part.]
As added by P.L.1-1998, SEC.3.
Notes of Decisions
Jason M. Morris v. State of Indiana, 114 N.E.3d 531 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “These rules were adopted pursuant to Indiana Code section 34-8-1-3, which authorizes the supreme court to adopt, amend, and rescind rules of court that govern and control practice and procedure in all the courts of Indiana.”
State of Indiana v. Elvis Holtsclaw, 977 N.E.2d 348 (Ind. 2012).
· cites it 2× “” Ind.Code § 34-8-1-3 (2008). Thus, in this conflict between Indiana Code § 35-38-4-2 and our Appellate Rule 9, the former must give way to the latter.”
Budden v. Bd. of Sch. Commissioners, 698 N.E.2d 1157 (Ind. 1998).
· cites it 2× “Indiana Code § 34-8-1-3 in turn provides that "all laws in conflict with the supreme court's rules have no further force or effect.”
N.E. v. Indiana Dep't of Child Servs., 5 N.E.3d 786 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 6× “Specifically, the court declared: The primacy of this Court’s rules of practice and procedure, recognized in Indiana Code section 34-8-1-3 (“thereafter all laws in conflict with the supreme court’s rules have no further force or effect”) does not apply to the transfer rule…”
Noble Cnty. ex rel. Noble Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Rogers, 717 N.E.2d 591 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “Code § 34-5-2-1, now Ind.Code § 34-8-1-3, which states: “The supreme court has authority to adopt, amend, and rescind rules of court that govern and control practice and procedure in all the courts of Indiana.”
Symons Int'l Grp., Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 306 F.R.D. 612 (N.D. Ind. 2014).
· cites it 2× “” Ind. Code § 34-8-1-3 . After such adoption, “all laws in conflict with the supreme court’s rules have no further force or effect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.