Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 34-8-2-2 (2025)

Adoption and incorporation of rules of trial procedure

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 2. The general assembly adopts, and incorporates into the Indiana Code, the Indiana rules of trial procedure:

(1) as enacted by the general assembly in Acts 1969, c.191, s.1, and amended by P.L.319-1975, SECTION 1; and

(2) as accepted by the Indiana supreme court as being in effect on December 31, 1983.

[Pre-1998 Recodification Citation: 34-5-1-6.]

As added by P.L.1-1998, SEC.3.

 

IC 34-9ARTICLE 9. PARTIES

 

           Ch. 1.Representation of Parties by Attorneys
           Ch. 2.Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem for Minor Parties
           Ch. 3.Survival of Cause of Action After Death of Party

 

IC 34-9-1Chapter 1. Representation of Parties by Attorneys

 

           34-9-1-1Actions by private parties, attorneys, or corporations

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–2001 · leading case: Noble Cnty. v. Rogers, 745 N.E.2d 194 (Ind. 2001).
Noble Cnty. v. Rogers, 745 N.E.2d 194 (Ind. 2001). · cites it 4× “Code § 34-5-1-6 (1984); Ind. Code § 34-8-2-2 (1998). Presumably this belt and suspenders approach was designed to meet precisely the point that some provisions of the trial rules verge or encroach on substantive law.”
Harvest Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Inter-Ocean Ins. Co., 492 N.E.2d 686 (Ind. 1986). · cites it 2× “1(B) While a court may inform itself of foreign law in any manner it deems proper including calling upon counsel to aid it, Ind.Code § 34-8-2-2, there is no factual burden on a party to prove the foreign law.”
Budden v. Bd. of Sch. Commissioners, 698 N.E.2d 1157 (Ind. 1998). · cites it 2× “” Ind.Code § 34-8-2-2 (1998). This “incorporate by reference” provision, taken together with other statutes, evinces a plain intent to retain the 1970 legislative version of the Trial Rules to the extent not in conflict with Rules promulgated by this Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.