Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 35-36-9-5 (2025)

Determination within ten days of trial

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 5. Not later than ten (10) days before the initial trial date, the court shall determine whether the defendant is an individual with an intellectual disability based on the evidence set forth at the hearing under section 4 of this chapter. The court shall articulate findings supporting the court's determination under this section.

As added by P.L.158-1994, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.99-2007, SEC.204; P.L.117-2015, SEC.51.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2023 · leading case: Pruitt v. State, 903 N.E.2d 899 (Ind. 2009).
Pruitt v. State, 903 N.E.2d 899 (Ind. 2009). · cites it 3× “I.C. § 35-36-9-5 (emphasis added). If the judge determines that the defendant is an individual with mental retardation, the part of the state's charging instrument that seeks a death sentence against the defendant shall be dismissed.”
Pruitt v. State, 834 N.E.2d 90 (Ind. 2005). · cites it 4× “Apprendi/Ring Indiana law directs that when a defendant files a petition alleging that the defendant is a mentally retarded individual, the judge is to rule on the petition at a hearing to be held not later than ten days before the initial trial date.”
Commonwealth v. Sanchez, 36 A.3d 24 (Pa. 2011). · cites it 2× “137 (2001); Idaho Code § 19 -2515A (2003); Ind.Code 35-36-9-5 (1994); Kan. Stat. § 21-6622 (2011); Ky.”
Bowling v. Commonwealth, 163 S.W.3d 361 (Ky. 2005). · cites it 2× “725 § 5/114-15(b); Ind.Code § 35-36-9-5; Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4623 (b); Ky.”
Jenkins v. State, 498 S.E.2d 502 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 2× “§ 17-7-131; Ind.Code Ann. §§ 35-36-9-5; Kan. Stat. Ann.”
United States v. Nelson, 419 F. Supp. 2d 891 (E.D. La. 2006). · cites it 2× “3-1102; Ind.Code Ann. §§ 35-36-9-5; Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann.”
State v. Turner, 936 So. 2d 89 (La. 2006). “3-1102; Ind.Code Ann. §§ 35-36-9-5; Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann.”
Amendments to Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure & Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 875 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 2004). “5/114-15 (2003); Indiana, see Ind.Code § 35-36-9-5 (2002); Kentucky, see Ky.”
MICHAEL T OWENS v. State of Indiana, 206 N.E.3d 1187 (Ind. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “Code § 35 - 36-11-2 (using same to measure deadline for prosecution to file notice of intent to introduce the laboratory report); Ind. Code § 35-36-9-5 (using “initial trial date” to measure deadline for trial court to rule on defense petition alleging intellectual disability).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.