Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 35-41-1-29 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
As added by P.L.17-2001, SEC.14. Repealed by P.L.114-2012, SEC.135.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 2010–2019 · leading case: Whatley v. State, 928 N.E.2d 202 (Ind. 2010).
Whatley v. State, 928 N.E.2d 202 (Ind. 2010). “The phrase "youth program center" is defined by statute as "(1) A building or structure that on a regular basis provides recreational, vocational, academic, social, or other programs or services for persons less than eighteen (18) years of age[;] (2) [t]he real property on which…”
James Ripps v. State of Indiana, 968 N.E.2d 323 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “Instead, Ripps argues the trial court abused its discretion by revoking his entire suspended sentence because he “admitted he violated his probation,” “did everything in his power to fix the violation once he was made aware of it,” “voluntarily came to the Ripley County Sheriffs…”
United States v. Burrows, 905 F.3d 1061 (7th Cir. 2018). “(quoting Ind. Code § 35-41-1-29 (a) ). We found the statute unconstitutionally vague because "the use of the word 'regular' in the definition of 'youth program center' provides no objective standard, and thereby fails to place persons of ordinary intelligence on notice of the…”
Anthony Mark Sewell v. State of Indiana, 973 N.E.2d 96 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “67 recodified Indiana Code section 35-41-1-29.”
Shawn Towell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2016). “In 6 I.C. § 35-41-1-29 [repealed July 1, 2012].”
Jonathan McPherson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2018). “The recodification from section 35-41-1-29 to section 35-31.5-2-357 was effective on July 1, 2012.”
James C. McClernon v. State of Indiana (Ind. Ct. App. 2019). “2016) (quoting I.C. § 35-41-1-29(a)). [13] In agreeing with the defendant in Whatley, the Seventh Circuit held in relevant part as follows: the State argues that a person of ordinary intelligence would understand that the number of youth programs held at the Robinson Community…”
— Ind. Code § 35-41-1-29(a) — 1 case
James C. McClernon v. State of Indiana (Ind. Ct. App. 2019). “2016) (quoting I.C. § 35-41-1-29(a)). [13] In agreeing with the defendant in Whatley, the Seventh Circuit held in relevant part as follows: the State argues that a person of ordinary intelligence would understand that the number of youth programs held at the Robinson Community…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.