Ind. Code » Title 35
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6 (2026)

Schedule II

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 6. (a) The controlled substances listed in this section are included in schedule II.

     (b) Any of the following substances, except those narcotic drugs listed in other schedules, whether produced directly or indirectly by extraction from substances of vegetable origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, or by combination of extraction and chemical synthesis:

(1) Opium and opiate, and any salt, compound, derivative, or preparation of opium or opiate, excluding apomorphine, dextrorphan, nalbuphine, naloxone, naltrexone, and their respective salts but including:

(A) raw opium (9600);

(B) opium extracts (9610);

(C) opium fluid extracts (9620);

(D) powdered opium (9639);

(E) granulated opium (9640);

(F) tincture of opium (9630);

(G) codeine (9050);

(H) dihydroetorphine (9334);

(I) ethylmorphine (9190);

(J) etorphine hydrochloride (9059);

(K) hydrocodone (9193), and any hydrocodone combination product, as determined by the federal Food and Drug Administration;

(L) hydromorphone (9150);

(M) metopon (9260);

(N) morphine (9300);

(O) oxycodone (9143);

(P) oxymorphone (9652);

(Q) thebaine (9333); and

(R) oripavine.

(2) Any salt, compound, isomer, derivative, or preparation thereof which is chemically equivalent or identical with any of the substances referred to in subdivision (b)(1) of this section, but not including the isoquinoline alkaloids of opium.

(3) Opium poppy and poppy straw.

(4) Coca leaves (9040) and any salt, compound, derivative, or preparation of coca leaves (including cocaine (9041) and ecgonine (8180) and their salts, isomers, derivatives, and salts of isomers and derivatives), and any salt, compound, derivative, or preparation thereof that is chemically equivalent or identical with these substances except that the substances do not include:

(A) decocainized coca leaves or an extraction of coca leaves that does not contain cocaine or ecgonine;

(B) [123I]ioflupane; or

(C) [18F]FP-CIT.

(5) Concentrate of poppy straw (the crude extract of poppy straw in either liquid, solid, or powder form which contains the phenanthrene alkaloids of the opium poppy) (9670).

     (c) Opiates. Any of the following opiates, including their isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters, and ethers whenever the existence of these isomers, esters, ethers, and salts is possible within the specific chemical designation:

Alfentanil (9737)

Alphaprodine (9010)

Anileridine (9020)

Bezitramide (9800)

Bulk dextropropoxyphene (nondosage forms) (9273)

Carfentanil (9743)

Dihydrocodeine (9120)

Diphenoxylate (9170)

Fentanyl (9801)

Isomethadone (9226)

Levo-alphacetylmethadol (9648). Other names: Levo-alpha-acetylmethadol; levomethadyl acetate; and LAAM.

Levomethorphan (9210)

Levorphanol (9220)

Metazocine (9240)

Methadone (9250)

Methadone-Intermediate, 4-cyano-2-dimethyl-amino-4, 4-diphenyl butane (9254)

Moramide-Intermediate, 2-methyl-3-morpholino-1, 1-diphenylpropane- carboxylic acid (9802)

Oliceridine (N-[(3-methoxythiophen- 2-yl) methyl]({2- [(9R)-9- (pyridin- 2-yl)-6-oxaspiro[4.5]decan-9-yl]ethyl})amine) (9245)

Pethidine (Meperidine) (9230)

Pethidine-Intermediate- A, 4-cyano-1-methyl-4-phenylpiperidine (9232)

Pethidine-Intermediate-B, ethyl-4-phenylpiperidine-4-carboxylate (9233)

Pethidine-Intermediate-C,1-methyl-4-phenylpiperidine-4-carboxylic acid (9234)

Phenazocine (9715)

Piminodine (9730)

Racemethorphan (9732)

Racemorphan (9733)

Remifentanil (9739)

Sufentanil (9740)

Tapentadol

Thiafentanil

     (d) Stimulants. Any material compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances having a potential for abuse associated with a stimulant effect on the central nervous system:

(1) Amphetamine, its salts, optical isomers, and salts of its optical isomers (1100).

(2) Methamphetamine, including its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers (1105).

(3) Phenmetrazine and its salts (1631).

(4) Methylphenidate (1724).

(5) Lisdexamfetamine, its salts, its isomers, and salts of its isomers.

     (e) Depressants. Unless specifically excepted by rule of the board or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances having a depressant effect on the central nervous system, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers whenever the existence of such salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation:

Amobarbital (2125)

Glutethimide (2550)

Pentobarbital (2270)

Phencyclidine (7471)

Secobarbital (2315)

     (f) Immediate precursors. Unless specifically excepted by rule of the board or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances:

(1) Immediate precursor to amphetamine and methamphetamine: Phenylacetone (8501). Some trade or other names: phenyl-2-propanone; P2P; benzyl methyl ketone; methyl benzyl ketone.

(2) Immediate precursors to phencyclidine (PCP):

(A) 1-phenylcyclohexylamine (7460); or

(B) 1-piperidinocyclohexanecarbonitrile (PCC) (8603).

(3) Immediate precursor to fentanyl:

(A) 4-anilino-N-phenethylpiperidine (ANPP) (8333); or

(B) N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-4-yl)propionamide (norfentanyl) (8366).

     (g) Hallucinogenic substances:

Dronabinol oral solution. Other name: (-)-delta-9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC).

Nabilone (7379). Other name: (+/-)-trans-3- (1,1-dimethylheptyl)-6, 6a, 7, 8, 10, 10a-hexahydro-1-hydroxy -6, 6-dimethyl-9H-dibenzo [b,d] pyran-9-one.

As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.7. Amended by Acts 1979, P.L.303, SEC.4; Acts 1981, P.L.170, SEC.3; P.L.333-1983, SEC.2; P.L.77-1984, SEC.13; P.L.327-1985, SEC.2; P.L.156-1986, SEC.5; P.L.329-1987, SEC.1; P.L.31-1998, SEC.9; P.L.22-2008, SEC.2; P.L.283-2013, SEC.2; P.L.56-2015, SEC.3; P.L.89-2018, SEC.3; P.L.119-2019, SEC.5; P.L.61-2020, SEC.7; P.L.48-2023, SEC.5; P.L.84-2024, SEC.4.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: Krise v. State, 746 N.E.2d 957 (Ind. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Krise v. State, 746 N.E.2d 957 (Ind. 2001). · cites it 2× “Ind.Code §§ 35-48-2-6(d)(2) (1993) and 35-48-4-7(a)(2)(B) (Supp.”
Brian M. Marley v. State of Indiana, 17 N.E.3d 335 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(1)(O); see also Toney v.”
Dawson v. State, 786 N.E.2d 742 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Methamphetamine is a schedule II controlled substance as listed in Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6 (Burns Code Ed. Repl.”
Jeremiah Edward Erickson v. State of Indiana, 72 N.E.3d 965 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “See Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6 (b)(l)(0). 2 . In this case, the Cl was compensated by the DEA for his services and the parties do not dispute he acted as an agent of the government.”
Richardson v. State, 856 N.E.2d 1222 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “§ 22-11-20-1]) with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine or amphetamine, schedule II controlled substances under [IC. § 35-48-2-6], commits a Class D felony.”
Carnes v. State, 480 N.E.2d 581 (Ind. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(e)(1) (1982). 3 . The court implied a different result might have been reached if the substances had allegedly been seen on the person of the accused, rather than in his home.”
Teer v. State, 738 N.E.2d 283 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “Ind Code § 35-48-2-6(d)(2). Teer had been convicted of manufacturing and possessing methamphetamine by an Arkansas court on September 20, 1996.”
Shirley v. State, 803 N.E.2d 251 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Indeed, lab tests indicated that the pills were oxycodone, a schedule II controlled sub-See Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(1)(N). stance. 3 .”
Grimm v. State, 401 N.E.2d 686 (Ind. 1980). · cites it 2× “1-2-6 (Burns 1975) (current version at Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6 (Burns 1979 Repl.)).”
Collins v. State, 659 N.E.2d 509 (Ind. 1995). · cites it 2× “Cocaine is listed in Schedule IL Ind.Code Ann. § 35-48-2-6 (West Supp.1994).”
Williams v. State, 959 N.E.2d 360 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(c). 3 . See, e.g., Ind.”
M.Q.M. v. State, 840 N.E.2d 441 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(4) (listing cocaine as a schedule II controlled substance).”
Show all 36 citing cases →
— Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(1)(K) — 1 case
William McCormick v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2016).
— Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(1)(N) — 1 case
Shirley v. State, 803 N.E.2d 251 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “Indeed, lab tests indicated that the pills were oxycodone, a schedule II controlled sub-See Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(1)(N). stance. 3 .”
— Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(1)(O) — 1 case
Brian M. Marley v. State of Indiana, 17 N.E.3d 335 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). “See Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(1)(O); see also Toney v.”
— Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(4) — 2 cases
M.Q.M. v. State, 840 N.E.2d 441 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). “See Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(b)(4) (listing cocaine as a schedule II controlled substance).”
MQM v. State, 840 N.E.2d 441 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006).
— Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6(c) — 2 cases
Williams v. State, 959 N.E.2d 360 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012). “Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(c). 3 . See, e.g., Ind.”
Vincent L. Gant v. State of Indiana (Ind. Ct. App. 2012).
— Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6(d)(2) — 5 cases
Krise v. State, 746 N.E.2d 957 (Ind. 2001). “Ind.Code §§ 35-48-2-6(d)(2) (1993) and 35-48-4-7(a)(2)(B) (Supp.”
Teer v. State, 738 N.E.2d 283 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). “Ind Code § 35-48-2-6(d)(2). Teer had been convicted of manufacturing and possessing methamphetamine by an Arkansas court on September 20, 1996.”
Krise v. State, 718 N.E.2d 1136 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999).
Clayton v. State, 491 N.E.2d 534 (Ind. 1986).
Payne (N.D. Ind. 2026).
— Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6(e)(1) — 1 case
Carnes v. State, 480 N.E.2d 581 (Ind. Ct. App. 1985). “Ind.Code § 35-48-2-6(e)(1) (1982). 3 . The court implied a different result might have been reached if the substances had allegedly been seen on the person of the accused, rather than in his home.”
— Ind. Code § 35-48-2-6(eX5) — 1 case
Thorne v. State, 429 N.E.2d 644 (Ind. 1981).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.