Indiana Code
Ind. Code § 35-48-4-15 (2025)
Repealed
✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
As added by P.L.67-1990, SEC.13. Amended by P.L.107-1991, SEC.3; P.L.129-1993, SEC.2; P.L.64-1994, SEC.6; P.L.76-2004, SEC.23; P.L.125-2012, SEC.415; P.L.217-2014, SEC.194; P.L.252-2017, SEC.26. Repealed by P.L.110-2020, SEC.13.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1993–2020 · leading case: Adams v. State, 960 N.E.2d 793 (Ind. 2012).
Adams v. State, 960 N.E.2d 793 (Ind. 2012). “” Ind. Code § 35-48-4-15 (a) (2008); see also Act of March 17, 2004, P.”
Mitchell v. State, 659 N.E.2d 112 (Ind. 1995). “Ind.Code Ann. § 35-48-4-15 (West Supp.1992).”
Scott Hitch v. State of Indiana, 51 N.E.3d 216 (Ind. 2016). “Code § 35-48-4-15 (2014), and mandatory HIV testing, which if positive is disclosed to the defendant’s victims, Ind.”
Adams v. State, 946 N.E.2d 630 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). “1 He also appeals the trial court’s decision to suspend his driver’s license and registration pursuant to Ind. Code § 35-48-4-15 . 2 We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 30, 2009, Adams was a passenger in a car pulled over for speeding.”
Maher v. State, 612 N.E.2d 1063 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993). “CODE § 35-48-4-15(a), the statute in question, requires the suspension of a convicted drug offender's driver's license and vehicle registration without any process whatsoever.”
Walker v. State, 661 N.E.2d 869 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). “CODE § 35-48-4-15. We affirm. The facts most favorable to the State reveal that on August 14, 1994, Kokomo police officers Kevin Ogle and Norman Tate were dispatched to a tavern to investigate a fight involving weapons.”
Mitchell v. State, 638 N.E.2d 1299 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994). “§ 35-48-4-15 does not require any kind of nexus between the crime committed and the use of a motor vehicle.”
Kristen Joy McGuinness v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), 155 N.E.3d 659 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “2012) (addressing now-repealed Ind. Code § 35-48-4-15 – which made license suspension mandatory when a motor vehicle was “used” in the commission of certain drug offenses – and stating, “The statute leaves the court discretion to decide the length of the suspension, but not…”
Ind. Code § 35-48-4-15(a): 4 cases
Adams v. State, 960 N.E.2d 793 (Ind. 2012). “” Ind. Code § 35-48-4-15 (a) (2008); see also Act of March 17, 2004, P.”
Maher v. State, 612 N.E.2d 1063 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993). “CODE § 35-48-4-15(a), the statute in question, requires the suspension of a convicted drug offender's driver's license and vehicle registration without any process whatsoever.”
Mitchell v. State, 659 N.E.2d 112 (Ind. 1995). “Ind.Code Ann. § 35-48-4-15 (West Supp.1992).”
Adams v. State, 946 N.E.2d 630 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). “1 He also appeals the trial court’s decision to suspend his driver’s license and registration pursuant to Ind. Code § 35-48-4-15 . 2 We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 30, 2009, Adams was a passenger in a car pulled over for speeding.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.