Ind. Code » Title 36
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 36-7-4-1010 (2025)

Repealed

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Pre-Local Government Recodification Citations: 18-7-2-81 part; 18-7-4-1010; 18-7-4-88 part; 18-7-5-92 part.]

As added by Acts 1981, P.L.309, SEC.23. Amended by Acts 1981, P.L.310, SEC.55. Repealed by P.L.126-2011, SEC.68.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2008–2009 · leading case: Lake Cnty. Trust Co. v. Advisory Plan Comm'n, 883 N.E.2d 124 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lake Cnty. Trust Co. v. Advisory Plan Comm'n, 883 N.E.2d 124 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 22× “In City of Charleston, the trial court awarded costs and attorney fees against the planning commission pursuant to Ind.Code § 36-7-4-1010 for its failure in bad faith to approve KBJ’s plat.”
City of Charlestown Advisory Plan. Comm'n v. KBJ, LLC, 879 N.E.2d 599 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 18× “An award of attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Ind.Code § 36-7-4-1010 is appropriate.” App.”
Lake Cnty. Trust Co. v. Advisory Plan Comm'n of Lake Cnty., 904 N.E.2d 1274 (Ind. 2009). · cites it 2× “Because we conclude that the Plan Commission did not act in bad faith, we do not address the parties' dispute regarding whether Indiana Code § 36-7-4-1010(a) provides a basis to recover attorney fees in this case.”
Ind. Code § 36-7-4-1010(a): 2 cases
Lake Cnty. Trust Co. v. Advisory Plan Comm'n, 883 N.E.2d 124 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). “In City of Charleston, the trial court awarded costs and attorney fees against the planning commission pursuant to Ind.Code § 36-7-4-1010 for its failure in bad faith to approve KBJ’s plat.”
Lake Cnty. Trust Co. v. Advisory Plan Comm'n of Lake Cnty., 904 N.E.2d 1274 (Ind. 2009). “Because we conclude that the Plan Commission did not act in bad faith, we do not address the parties' dispute regarding whether Indiana Code § 36-7-4-1010(a) provides a basis to recover attorney fees in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.