Ind. Code » Title 36
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 36-7-4-507 (2025)

Comprehensive plan; notice and hearings before adoption

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 507. Before the approval of a comprehensive plan, the plan commission must:

(1) give notice and hold one (1) or more public hearings on the plan;

(2) publish, in accordance with IC 5-3-1, a schedule stating the times and places of the hearing or hearings. The schedule must state the time and place of each hearing, and state where the entire plan is on file and may be examined in its entirety for at least ten (10) days before the hearing.

[Pre-Local Government Recodification Citations: 18-7-2-33; 18-7-4-507; 18-7-4-41; 18-7-5-39.]

As added by Acts 1981, P.L.309, SEC.23. Amended by Acts 1981, P.L.45, SEC.18; P.L.335-1985, SEC.9.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–2015 · leading case: Fifty Six LLC v. Metro. Dev. Comm'n, 38 N.E.3d 726 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fifty Six LLC v. Metro. Dev. Comm'n, 38 N.E.3d 726 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 12× “1 [8] On June 15, 2012, Landowner filed a “Verified Action For Mandate And Request For Declaratory Relief’ in which it asserted that the MDC failed to adhere to the public notice requirements for amendments to a comprehensive plan provided for in Ind.Code §§ 36-7-4-507 and…”
City of Anderson v. Irving Materials, Inc., 530 N.E.2d 730 (Ind. 1988). · cites it 2× “The plan commission must give notice and hold a hearing pursuant to Ind. Code § 36-7-4-507 (a). Failure of the legislature to pass the amendment within ninety days operates as a rejection.”
Fifty Six LLC, individually &, alternatively, in the name of the State of Indiana on relation of Fifty Six LLC v. The Metro. Dev. Comm'n of Marion Cnty., No. 49A05-1407-PL-323 (Ind. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015). · cites it 12× “1 [8] On June 15, 2012, Landowner filed a “Verified Action For Mandate And Request For Declaratory Relief” in which it asserted that the MDC failed to adhere to the public notice requirements for amendments to a comprehensive plan provided for in Ind. Code §§ 36-7-4-507 and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.