Ind. Code » Title 36
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 36-7-9-27 (2025)

Transfers of property by persons not complying with orders

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 27. (a) A person who has been issued and has received notice of an order relative to unsafe premises and has not complied with that order:

(1) must supply full information regarding the order to a person who takes or agrees to take a substantial property interest in the unsafe premises before transferring or agreeing to transfer that interest; and

(2) must, within five (5) days after transferring or agreeing to transfer a substantial property interest in the unsafe premises, supply the enforcement authority with written copies of:

(A) the full name, address, and telephone number of the person taking a substantial property interest in the unsafe premises; and

(B) the legal instrument under which the transfer or agreement to transfer the substantial property interest is accomplished.

     (b) If a judgment is obtained against the department, enforcement authority, or other governmental entity for the failure of that entity to provide notice to persons holding an interest in unsafe premises in an action taken by the entity under this chapter, a person who failed to comply with this section is liable to the entity for the amount of the judgment if it can be shown that the entity's failure to give notice was a result of that person's failure.

[Pre-Local Government Recodification Citation: 18-5-5.5-11.]

As added by Acts 1981, P.L.309, SEC.28.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2019 · leading case: M Doed, LLC v. Anthony Plasterer, No. 18A-MI-1743 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
M Doed, LLC v. Anthony Plasterer, No. 18A-MI-1743 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2019). · cites it 12× “Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-MI-1743 | April 30, 2019 Page 2 of 8 [3] On February 26, 2018, Doed filed a motion to set aside tax sale as void, alleging it was entitled to notice of the Order of Enforcement under Indiana Code section 36-7-9-27 and,…”
In the Matter of: Patrick H. Stern, 11 N.E.3d 917 (Ind. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code § 36-7-9-27(b). Thus, Respondent pursued a case on behalf of one client (JH) which, if successful, would make his other client (DR) liable for the judgment.”
Ind. Code § 36-7-9-27(a): 1 case
M Doed, LLC v. Anthony Plasterer, No. 18A-MI-1743 (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2019). “Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-MI-1743 | April 30, 2019 Page 2 of 8 [3] On February 26, 2018, Doed filed a motion to set aside tax sale as void, alleging it was entitled to notice of the Order of Enforcement under Indiana Code section 36-7-9-27 and,…”
Ind. Code § 36-7-9-27(b): 1 case
In the Matter of: Patrick H. Stern, 11 N.E.3d 917 (Ind. 2014). “See Ind.Code § 36-7-9-27(b). Thus, Respondent pursued a case on behalf of one client (JH) which, if successful, would make his other client (DR) liable for the judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.