Ind. Code » Title 36
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7 (2025)

Hearings; hearing authority findings and action; additional period for ordered actions; continuous enforcement order; performance bond; record of findings; collection of penalties

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 7. (a) A hearing must be held relative to each order of the enforcement authority, except for an order issued under section 5(a)(2), 5(a)(3), 5(a)(4), 5(a)(5), or 7.5 of this chapter. An order issued under section 5(a)(2), 5(a)(3), 5(a)(4), 5(a)(5), or 7.5 of this chapter becomes final ten (10) days after notice is given, unless a hearing is requested before the ten (10) day period ends by a person holding a fee interest, life estate interest, mortgage interest, or equitable interest of a contract purchaser in the unsafe premises. The hearing shall be conducted by the hearing authority.

     (b) The hearing shall be held on a business day no earlier than ten (10) days after notice of the order is given. The hearing authority may, however, take action at the hearing, or before the hearing if a written request is received by the enforcement authority not later than five (5) days after notice is given, to continue the hearing to a business day not later than fourteen (14) days after the hearing date shown on the order. Unless the hearing authority takes action to have the continued hearing held on a definite, specified date, notice of the continued hearing must be given to the person to whom the order was issued at least five (5) days before the continued hearing date, in the manner prescribed by section 25 of this chapter. If the order being considered at the continued hearing was served by publication, it is sufficient to give notice of the continued hearing by publication unless the enforcement authority has received information in writing that enables it to make service under section 25 of this chapter by a method other than publication.

     (c) The person to whom the order was issued, any person having a substantial property interest in the unsafe premises that are the subject of the order, or any other person with an interest in the proceedings may appear in person or by counsel at the hearing. Each person appearing at the hearing is entitled to present evidence, cross-examine opposing witnesses, and present arguments.

     (d) At the conclusion of any hearing at which a continuance is not granted, the hearing authority may make findings and take action to:

(1) affirm the order;

(2) rescind the order; or

(3) modify the order, but unless the person to whom the order was issued, or counsel for that person, is present at the hearing, the hearing authority may modify the order in only a manner that makes its terms less stringent.

     (e) In addition to affirming the order, in those cases in which the hearing authority finds that there has been a willful failure to comply with the order, the hearing authority may impose a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000). The effective date of the civil penalty may be postponed for a reasonable period, after which the hearing authority may order the civil penalty reduced or stricken if the hearing authority is satisfied that all work necessary to fully comply with the order has been done. For purposes of an appeal under section 8 of this chapter or enforcement of an order under section 17 of this chapter, action of the hearing authority is considered final upon the affirmation of the order, even though the hearing authority may retain jurisdiction for the ultimate determination related to the civil penalty. In the hearing authority's exercise of continuing jurisdiction, the hearing authority may, in addition to reducing or striking the civil penalty, impose one (1) or more additional civil penalties in an amount not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) per civil penalty. An additional civil penalty may be imposed if the hearing authority finds that:

(1) significant work on the premises to comply with the affirmed order has not been accomplished; and

(2) the premises have a negative effect on property values or the quality of life of the surrounding area or the premises require the provision of services by local government in excess of the services required by ordinary properties.

The hearing authority may not impose an additional civil penalty in a hearing to review a civil penalty imposed by the enforcement authority under section 7.5 of this chapter.

     (f) If, at a hearing, a person to whom an order has been issued requests an additional period to accomplish action required by the order, and shows good cause for this request to be granted, the hearing authority may grant the request. However, as a condition for allowing the additional period, the hearing authority may require that the person post a performance bond to be forfeited if the action required by the order is not completed within the additional period.

     (g) If an order is affirmed or modified, the hearing authority shall issue a continuous enforcement order (as defined in section 2 of this chapter).

     (h) The board or commission having control over the department shall, at a public hearing, after having given notice of the time and place of the hearing by publication in accordance with IC 5-3-1, adopt a schedule setting forth the maximum amount of performance bonds applicable to various types of ordered action. The hearing authority shall use this schedule to fix the amount of the performance bond required under subsection (f).

     (i) The record of the findings made and action taken by the hearing authority at the hearing shall be available to the public upon request. However, neither the enforcement authority nor the hearing authority is required to give any person notice of the findings and action.

     (j) If a civil penalty under subsection (e) is unpaid for more than fifteen (15) days after payment of the civil penalty is due, the civil penalty may be collected from any person against whom the hearing officer assessed the civil penalty or fine. A civil penalty or fine may be collected under this subsection in the same manner as costs under section 13 or 13.5 of this chapter. The amount of the civil penalty or fine that is collected shall be deposited in the unsafe building fund.

[Pre-Local Government Recodification Citations: 18-5-5.5-6; 18-5-5.5-7.]

As added by Acts 1981, P.L.309, SEC.28. Amended by Acts 1981, P.L.45, SEC.26; P.L.59-1986, SEC.7; P.L.14-1991, SEC.12; P.L.177-2003, SEC.5; P.L.169-2006, SEC.60; P.L.88-2009, SEC.9; P.L.247-2015, SEC.42.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2024 · leading case: Freidline v. Civil City of South Bend, 733 N.E.2d 490 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Freidline v. Civil City of South Bend, 733 N.E.2d 490 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 18× “Issue 1 The Land Trust raises three issues, which we consolidate and restate as follows: Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the City when the penalty provision of Indiana Code section 36-7-9-7(d) is a criminal sanction, and thus, the Land Trust…”
Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 659 N.E.2d 1132 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Indiana Code 36-7-9-7 governs notice of actions of a hearing authority, ard does not require written notice of a hearing authority's action be provided to the parties.”
Towne & Terrace Corp. v. City of Indianapolis, 122 N.E.3d 846 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “And Indiana Code Section 36-7-9-7 provides in relevant part that a hearing must be held relative to an order issued under Indiana Code Section 36-7-9-4(c).”
City of Charlestown v. Charlestown Pleasant Ridge Neighborhood Ass'n Corp., 111 N.E.3d 199 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Appealed Order at 20 (# 91) (citing Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7 (a) and PMC § 111.1); Ex.”
Alan Van Meter v. Cmty. Dev. & Redevelopment, 152 N.E.3d 22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 18× “[18] In sum, the hearing contemplated by I.C. § 36-7-9-7 was held on August 19, 2019, and no continuance of the hearing was sought.”
Read v. City of South Bend, 687 N.E.2d 265 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “CODE § 36-7-9-7 (1993 Supp.) (c) The person to whom the order was issued, any person having a substantial property interest in the unsafe premises that are the subject of the order, or any other person with an interest in the proceedings may appear in person or by counsel at the…”
Philip R. Davis v. City of Fort Wayne, No. 02A03-1209-PL-385 (Ind. Ct. App. May 29, 2013). · cites it 13× “3 Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7 (d) (emphasis added).”
People of Conviction, Inc. v. Neighborhood Code Enf't (mem. dec.), No. 02A03-1704-MI-1138 (Ind. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2018). · cites it 5× “Upon the entry of such an order by an enforcement authority, INDIANA CODE § 36-7-9-7 requires that a hearing must be held and “conducted by the hearing authority.”
Ronald E Davidhizar v. City of Goshen, 247 N.E.3d 811 (Ind. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 5× “We explained that the Board had held the review hearing, as required by INDIANA CODE § 36-7-9-7, on August 19 and had taken action by affirming the demolition order without any continuances.”
Mark A. Valdes v. Vincennes Bldg. & Saf. Comm'n & the City of Vincennes, No. 42A01-1302-PL-88 (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 27, 2013). · cites it 8× “Indiana Code Section 36-7-9-7 in turn provides that a “hearing authority” must hold a hearing with respect to a demolition order issued by a municipal “enforcement authority”; in the present case, the Commission was the “hearing authority” and the City’s building inspection…”
Silver Lake Partners, LLC v. Town of Silver Lake, No. 18A-PL-2701 (Ind. Ct. App. June 7, 2019). · cites it 2× “Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7 (2015). The hearing authority may affirm, rescind, or modify the order.”
City of Shelbyville v. Frank P. & Shirlene Sundvall, No. 73A01-1203-PL-98 (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 8, 2012). · cites it 2× “§ 36-7-9-8 (West, Westlaw current through all 2012 legislation) provides for judicial review of an enforcement action under Ind. Code Ann. § 36-7-9-7 (d) or (e). It appears from the record that the parties’ arguments pertain to the review set forth in I.”
Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7(a): 2 cases
People of Conviction, Inc. v. Neighborhood Code Enf't (mem. dec.), No. 02A03-1704-MI-1138 (Ind. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2018). “Upon the entry of such an order by an enforcement authority, INDIANA CODE § 36-7-9-7 requires that a hearing must be held and “conducted by the hearing authority.”
Alan Van Meter v. Cmty. Dev. & Redevelopment, 152 N.E.3d 22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “[18] In sum, the hearing contemplated by I.C. § 36-7-9-7 was held on August 19, 2019, and no continuance of the hearing was sought.”
Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7(b): 1 case
Alan Van Meter v. Cmty. Dev. & Redevelopment, 152 N.E.3d 22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “[18] In sum, the hearing contemplated by I.C. § 36-7-9-7 was held on August 19, 2019, and no continuance of the hearing was sought.”
Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7(c): 2 cases
Read v. City of South Bend, 687 N.E.2d 265 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997). “CODE § 36-7-9-7 (1993 Supp.) (c) The person to whom the order was issued, any person having a substantial property interest in the unsafe premises that are the subject of the order, or any other person with an interest in the proceedings may appear in person or by counsel at the…”
Alan Van Meter v. Cmty. Dev. & Redevelopment, 152 N.E.3d 22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “[18] In sum, the hearing contemplated by I.C. § 36-7-9-7 was held on August 19, 2019, and no continuance of the hearing was sought.”
Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7(d): 5 cases
Freidline v. Civil City of South Bend, 733 N.E.2d 490 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). “Issue 1 The Land Trust raises three issues, which we consolidate and restate as follows: Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the City when the penalty provision of Indiana Code section 36-7-9-7(d) is a criminal sanction, and thus, the Land Trust…”
Alan Van Meter v. Cmty. Dev. & Redevelopment, 152 N.E.3d 22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “[18] In sum, the hearing contemplated by I.C. § 36-7-9-7 was held on August 19, 2019, and no continuance of the hearing was sought.”
Ronald E Davidhizar v. City of Goshen, 247 N.E.3d 811 (Ind. Ct. App. 2024). “We explained that the Board had held the review hearing, as required by INDIANA CODE § 36-7-9-7, on August 19 and had taken action by affirming the demolition order without any continuances.”
People of Conviction, Inc. v. Neighborhood Code Enf't (mem. dec.), No. 02A03-1704-MI-1138 (Ind. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2018). “Upon the entry of such an order by an enforcement authority, INDIANA CODE § 36-7-9-7 requires that a hearing must be held and “conducted by the hearing authority.”
Philip R. Davis v. City of Fort Wayne, No. 02A03-1209-PL-385 (Ind. Ct. App. May 29, 2013). “3 Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7 (d) (emphasis added).”
Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7(g): 2 cases
Alan Van Meter v. Cmty. Dev. & Redevelopment, 152 N.E.3d 22 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020). “[18] In sum, the hearing contemplated by I.C. § 36-7-9-7 was held on August 19, 2019, and no continuance of the hearing was sought.”
Mark A. Valdes v. Vincennes Bldg. & Saf. Comm'n & the City of Vincennes, No. 42A01-1302-PL-88 (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 27, 2013). “Indiana Code Section 36-7-9-7 in turn provides that a “hearing authority” must hold a hearing with respect to a demolition order issued by a municipal “enforcement authority”; in the present case, the Commission was the “hearing authority” and the City’s building inspection…”
Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7(i): 1 case
Philip R. Davis v. City of Fort Wayne, No. 02A03-1209-PL-385 (Ind. Ct. App. May 29, 2013). “3 Ind. Code § 36-7-9-7 (d) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.