Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 8-1-2.5-5 (2025)

Commission's order declining jurisdiction

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 5. (a) Notwithstanding any other law or rule adopted by the commission, except those cited, or rules adopted that pertain to those cited, in section 11 of this chapter, on the request of an energy utility electing to become subject to this section, the commission may enter an order, after notice and hearing, that the public interest requires the commission to commence an orderly process to decline to exercise, in whole or in part, its jurisdiction over either the energy utility or the retail energy service of the energy utility, or both.

     (b) In determining whether the public interest will be served, the commission shall consider the following:

(1) Whether technological or operating conditions, competitive forces, or the extent of regulation by other state or federal regulatory bodies render the exercise, in whole or in part, of jurisdiction by the commission unnecessary or wasteful.

(2) Whether the commission's declining to exercise, in whole or in part, its jurisdiction will be beneficial for the energy utility, the energy utility's customers, or the state.

(3) Whether the commission's declining to exercise, in whole or in part, its jurisdiction will promote energy utility efficiency.

(4) Whether the exercise of commission jurisdiction inhibits an energy utility from competing with other providers of functionally similar energy services or equipment.

As added by P.L.108-1995, SEC.3.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co., 735 N.E.2d 790 (Ind. 2000).
United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co., 735 N.E.2d 790 (Ind. 2000). · cites it 2× “” Ind.Code § 8-1-2.5-5(a) (West Supp.1999).”
BP Prods. North Am., Inc. v. Indiana Off. of Util. Consum. Couns., 947 N.E.2d 471 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “In the alternative, BP requested that if the Commission should find BP to be acting as a public utility, that the Commission decline to exercise jurisdiction over BP pursuant to Indiana Code section 8-1-2.5-5 (1995) 2 and Indiana Code sections 8-1-2-61.”
Lone Oak Solar Energy LLC v. Indiana Off. of Util. Consum. Couns., No. 24A-EX-00033 (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2024). · cites it 6× “I.C. § 8-1-2.5-5 (2018). In determining whether the public interest would be served by entering any such order, the Indiana Code directs the IURC to consider: (1) Whether technological or operating conditions, competitive forces, or the extent of regulation by other state or…”
Ind. Code § 8-1-2.5-5(a): 1 case
United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co., 735 N.E.2d 790 (Ind. 2000). “” Ind.Code § 8-1-2.5-5(a) (West Supp.1999).”
Ind. Code § 8-1-2.5-5(b): 1 case
Lone Oak Solar Energy LLC v. Indiana Off. of Util. Consum. Couns., No. 24A-EX-00033 (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2024). “I.C. § 8-1-2.5-5 (2018). In determining whether the public interest would be served by entering any such order, the Indiana Code directs the IURC to consider: (1) Whether technological or operating conditions, competitive forces, or the extent of regulation by other state or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.