Ind. Code » Title 8
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 8-1-2.6-3 (2025)

Repealed

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As added by P.L.92-1985, SEC.1. Repealed by P.L.27-2006, SEC.61.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2005 · leading case: Nextel West Corp. v. Indiana Util. Regulatory Comm'n, 831 N.E.2d 134 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nextel West Corp. v. Indiana Util. Regulatory Comm'n, 831 N.E.2d 134 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 8× “Any Commission authority to change a telephone's utility rates using the [ARS] must derive from Ind.Code § 8-1-2.6-3, which gives the Commission authority to develop and use alternative 'regulatory procedures or generic standards' with respect to telephone companies or services.”
Indiana Bell Tel. Co. v. Off. of Util. Consum. Couns., 717 N.E.2d 613 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “Ind.Code § 8-1-2.6-3 provides: Notwithstanding any other statute, the [Cjommission may: (1) on its own motion; (2) at the request of the utility consumer counselor; (3) at the request of one (1) or more telephone companies; or (4) at the request of any class satisfying the…”
Ind. Code § 8-1-2.6-3(2): 1 case
Nextel West Corp. v. Indiana Util. Regulatory Comm'n, 831 N.E.2d 134 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). “Any Commission authority to change a telephone's utility rates using the [ARS] must derive from Ind.Code § 8-1-2.6-3, which gives the Commission authority to develop and use alternative 'regulatory procedures or generic standards' with respect to telephone companies or services.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.