Ind. Code » Title 8
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 8-1-2.8-3 (2025)

"Dual party relay services"

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     Sec. 3. (a) As used in this chapter, "dual party relay services" means telecommunications transmission services that provide the ability for a person who has a hearing impairment or speech impairment to engage in communication with a hearing person in a manner that is functionally equivalent to the ability of an individual who does not have a hearing impairment or speech impairment to communicate using voice communication services.

     (b) The term includes services that enable two-way communication between a person who uses a telecommunications device for individuals who are deaf or other nonvoice terminal and a person who does not use such a device.

As added by P.L.75-1991, SEC.1. Amended by P.L.27-2006, SEC.28; P.L.99-2007, SEC.31.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1987–2009 · leading case: United Rural Elec. Membership Corp. v. Indiana & Michigan Elec. Co., 515 N.E.2d 1135 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United Rural Elec. Membership Corp. v. Indiana & Michigan Elec. Co., 515 N.E.2d 1135 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987). “CODE § 8-1-2.8-3(f) provides that utilities can submit to the Commission petitions and maps depicting proposed service areas requesting approval of the areas.”
Paoli Mun. Light Dep't v. Orange Cnty. Rural Elec. Membership Corp., 904 N.E.2d 1280 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Because the Town of Paoli did not petition the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to realign the utility service boundaries and allow the Town of Paoli to service its own Sports Complex pursuant to I.C. § 8-1-2.8-3, the Sports Complex is still properly located within REMC's…”
Ind. Code § 8-1-2.8-3(f): 1 case
United Rural Elec. Membership Corp. v. Indiana & Michigan Elec. Co., 515 N.E.2d 1135 (Ind. Ct. App. 1987). “CODE § 8-1-2.8-3(f) provides that utilities can submit to the Commission petitions and maps depicting proposed service areas requesting approval of the areas.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.