Ind. Code » Title 9
Indiana Code

Ind. Code § 9-24-1-8 (2025)

Repealed

✓ 2025 Indiana Code: the 2026 session is not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaInd. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Pre-1991 Recodification Citations: 9-1-4-53(c) part; 9-1-13-9 part; 9-8-9-7 part.]

As added by P.L.2-1991, SEC.12. Amended by P.L.217-2014, SEC.77. Repealed by P.L.188-2015, SEC.93.

 

IC 9-24-2Chapter 2. Individuals Prohibited From Obtaining a License or Permit

 

           9-24-2-1Truants, suspended and expelled students, and dropouts
           9-24-2-2Juveniles under court orders concerning controlled substance violations
           9-24-2-2.5Persons under court orders concerning controlled substance violations or criminal mischief
           9-24-2-3Individuals to whom bureau may not issue license or permit
           9-24-2-3.1Conditional driving privileges; termination and renewal; suspension
           9-24-2-4Invalidation and revalidation of license; truant, suspended and expelled, and withdrawn students
           9-24-2-5Hearings
           9-24-2-6Violations

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2004–2014 · leading case: Nevel v. State, 818 N.E.2d 1 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nevel v. State, 818 N.E.2d 1 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “" IC. § 9-24-1-8. Further, it is a class C misdemeanor to refuse to provide either "name, address, and date of birth; or driver's license, if in the person's possession; to a law enforcement officer who has stopped the person for an infraction or ordinance violation.”
Brandan Jones v. State of Indiana, 22 N.E.3d 877 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Ind.Code Ann. § 9-24-1-8 (West, Westlaw current with all 2014 Public Laws of the 2014 Second Regular Session and Second Regular Technical Session of the 118th General Assembly).”
Michael Antipin v. State of Indiana, No. 31A05-1311-PC-536 (Ind. Ct. App. Sept. 26, 2014). · cites it 2× “3 I.C. § 9-24-1-8(a). 2 We affirm. ISSUE Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied Antipin’s Petition.”
Ind. Code § 9-24-1-8(a): 1 case
Michael Antipin v. State of Indiana, No. 31A05-1311-PC-536 (Ind. Ct. App. Sept. 26, 2014). “3 I.C. § 9-24-1-8(a). 2 We affirm. ISSUE Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied Antipin’s Petition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.