Iowa Code » Chapter 1 — SOVEREIGNTY AND JURISDICTION OF THE STATE
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 1.3 (2026)

Concurrent jurisdiction

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state has concurrent jurisdiction on the waters of any river or lake which forms a common boundary between this and any other state. [C51, §3; R60, §3; C73, §3; C97, §3; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §3; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §1.3] See Act of Congress, Sess. II, Chapter 48, 5 Stat. 742 (1845); Act of Congress, Sess. I, Chapter 82, 9 Stat. 52 (1846); Act of Congress, Sess. II, Chapter 1, 9 Stat. 117 (1846)

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1973–2025 · leading case: State v. LeGear, 346 N.W.2d 21 (Iowa 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. LeGear, 346 N.W.2d 21 (Iowa 1984). · cites it 4× “Much evidence was introduced at trial concerning the exact location of Larri-son’s car when defendant pulled Kresl from it.”
Iowa Ass'n of Sch. Boards v. Iowa Dep't of Educ., 739 N.W.2d 303 (Iowa 2007). · cites it 4× “Rhodes, Holmes’s Appleman on Insurance 2d § 1.3, at 16 (1996) (noting common-law definition of insurance describes insurer’s obligation to pay “ ‘upon the destruction, loss or injury of something in which the [insured] has an interest’ ” (emphasis added) (quoting Mass.”
State v. Killpack, 276 N.W.2d 368 (Iowa 1979). · cites it 4× “5(c) (1968), and Standards Relating to Probation, section 1.3 (1970). In State v. Cupples, 260 Iowa 1192, 1197 , 152 N.”
Chariton Feed & Grain, Inc. v. Harder, 369 N.W.2d 777 (Iowa 1985). · cites it 2× “2 (Requirement That Right to Possession be Transferred); § 1.3 (Capacity and Authority to Enter into the Landlord-Tenant Relationship); § 1.”
State v. Cline, 617 N.W.2d 277 (Iowa 2000). “According to one authority in this area, “[t]he most careful and balanced assessment conducted to date of all available empirical data shows ‘that the general level of the rule’s effects on criminal prosecutions is marginal at most.”
State v. Duncan, 312 N.W.2d 519 (Iowa 1981). “6: Before the defendant can be found guilty of burglary in the second degree the burden is upon the State to establish by the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt each and all of the following propositions: 1.”
State v. Morrison, 323 N.W.2d 254 (Iowa 1982). “5(c) (1968); ABA Standards, Probation, § 1.3(a). Defendant has not demonstrated that the court either abused its discretion or employed invalid criteria in denying his request for probation.”
State v. Peckenschneider, 236 N.W.2d 344 (Iowa 1975). · cites it 2× “5(c) and Standards Relating to Probation, § 1.3 (Approved Draft 1970). They implement the general principle in Standard 2.”
Bankord v. DeRock, 423 F. Supp. 602 (N.D. Iowa 1976). · cites it 2× “On appeal, the plaintiff argued, and the defendant conceded that both Iowa and Illinois had concurrent jurisdiction of the river area pursuant to Iowa Code § 1.3 (1966). Therefore, the supreme court expressed no opinion on the trial court’s ruling.”
State v. Moreland, 252 N.W.2d 465 (Iowa 1977). · cites it 2× “Therefore, it appears to me the majority overreaches in needlessly repudiating ABA Standards Relating to Probation, Approved Draft 1970, § 1.3. Furthermore, the majority superfluously strains to again disavow ABA Standards Relating to Sentencing Alternatives and Procedures,…”
Powers v. Fisher Controls Co., Inc., 246 N.W.2d 279 (Iowa 1976). · cites it 2× ““Any absence from active employment with the Company, including, but not limited to, absence by reason of discharge or resignation, which is not deemed a leave of absence or a layoff as such terms are defined in Section 1.3 hereof, shall be considered, for all purposes of the…”
Van Natta v. Sara Lee Corp., 439 F. Supp. 2d 911 (N.D. Iowa 2006). “at § 1.3, at 2; id. at § 2, at 4; see id. at Appendix, Definitions, at 52 (defining “Committee”).”
Show all 25 citing cases →
— Iowa Code § 1.3(1) — 1 case
McGruder v. State, 420 N.W.2d 425 (Iowa 1988).
— Iowa Code § 1.3(a) — 1 case
State v. Morrison, 323 N.W.2d 254 (Iowa 1982). “5(c) (1968); ABA Standards, Probation, § 1.3(a). Defendant has not demonstrated that the court either abused its discretion or employed invalid criteria in denying his request for probation.”
— Iowa Code § 1.3(c) — 2 cases
State v. Cline, 617 N.W.2d 277 (Iowa 2000). “According to one authority in this area, “[t]he most careful and balanced assessment conducted to date of all available empirical data shows ‘that the general level of the rule’s effects on criminal prosecutions is marginal at most.”
State v. Duncan, 312 N.W.2d 519 (Iowa 1981). “6: Before the defendant can be found guilty of burglary in the second degree the burden is upon the State to establish by the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt each and all of the following propositions: 1.”
— Iowa Code § 1.3(f) — 1 case
State v. Jamison, 482 N.W.2d 409 (Iowa 1992).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.