Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 2.1 (2026)

Sessions — place

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The sessions of the general assembly shall be held annually at the seat of government, unless the governor shall convene them at some other place in times of pestilence or public danger. Each annual session of the general assembly shall commence on the second Monday in January of each year. The general assembly may recess from time to time during each year in such manner as it may provide, subject to Article III, section 14 of the Constitution of the State of Iowa. [C51, §4; R60, §13; C73, §5; C97, §5; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §5; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §2.1] 2006 Acts, ch 1010, §1

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 41 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1877–2024 · leading case: Helmke v. Bd. of Adj., City of Ruthven, 418 N.W.2d 346 (Iowa 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Helmke v. Bd. of Adj., City of Ruthven, 418 N.W.2d 346 (Iowa 1988). · cites it 12× “The Ruthven board of adjustment offered the following grounds for approval of a zoning compliance permit for the construction of the co-op's grain storage building: (1) the proposed facility would be a permitted use under article V, section 2, subsection 2.1 of the City of…”

Larry R. Hedlund v. State of Iowa, 930 N.W.2d 707 (Iowa 2019). · cites it 2× “2013); 1 Dobbs Law of Remedies § 2.1(2), at 59–60 (noting reinstatement is a form of specific performance, which is a type of injunctive relief, which is a type of equitable remedy); 2 Civil Actions 67 Against State and Local Government: Its Divisions, Agencies and Officers §…”

Bd. of Water Works Trs. of the City of Des Moines, Iowa v. Sac Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, as Tr. of Drainage Districts 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, & Calhoun Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors & Sac Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors as Jt. Trs. of Drainage Districts 2 & 51 & Buena Vista Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors & Sac Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors as Jt. Trs. of Drainage Districts 19, 890 N.W.2d 50 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 2× “We noted in Freeman the availability of nuisance to address environmental harms was endorsed by the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which included sections on both public and private nuisance. Id.; see Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 821B–821E, at 87–104 (1979).”

Bublitz v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 202 F.R.D. 251 (S.D. Iowa 2001). · cites it 6× “ure 23(a) requires the following prerequisites to bringing a class action: (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical…”

Bublitz v. EI duPont De Nemours & Co., 171 F. Supp. 2d 906 (S.D. Iowa 2001). · cites it 9× “Plan § 2.1(d). It is clear that in this case the Change in Control occurred when DuPont acquired twenty-five percent of Pioneer’s stock on October 1,1999.”

Hollinrake v. Monroe Cnty., 433 N.W.2d 696 (Iowa 1988). · cites it 4× “Accordingly, the academy enacted the current rule, 501 Iowa Administrative Code section 2.1 which, prior to March 11, 1987, was designated as 550 Iowa Administrative Code section 2.”

City of Panora v. Simmons, 445 N.W.2d 363 (Iowa 1989). · cites it 2× “It is unlawful for any parent, guardian or other person charged with the care and custody of any minor to allow or permit such minor to be in or upon any of the streets, alleys, places of business, or amusement or other public places within the curfew hours set by subsection 2.1…”

Laurie Freeman, Sharon Mockmore, Beccy Boysel, Gary D. Boysel, Linda L. Goreham, Gary R. Goreham, Kelcey Brackett, & Bobbie Lynn Weatherman v. Grain Processing Corp., 848 N.W.2d 58 (Iowa 2014). “According to one commentator, nuisance theory “has hung on from its horse-and-buggy origins” and “continues *67 to be the fulcrum of what is called today environmental law.”

State v. Jennings, 195 N.W.2d 351 (Iowa 1972). · cites it 2× “That same date the county attorney directed a communication to Judge McGiverin inquiring as to availability of a presiding judge for trial of the case.”

Rinehart v. State, 234 N.W.2d 649 (Iowa 1975). · cites it 2× “” In another comment, section 2.1, page 36, we are told that it is wholly inappropriate to attempt a single general definition of waiver for all claims.”

Wiedmeyer v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y of the United States, 644 N.W.2d 31 (Iowa 2002). · cites it 2× “1 of article II of the agency agreement provides: Agent, on behalf of Owner, shall implement, or cause to be implemented, the decisions of Owner and shall conduct the ordinary and usual business affairs of Owner as provided in this Agreement. Agent shall at all times conform to…”

Bublitz v. EI duPont De Nemours & Co., 224 F. Supp. 2d 1234 (S.D. Iowa 2002). · cites it 4× “On July 25, 2001, the Court certified a class of seventeen people defined as follows: Pioneer Pay Band III and Pay Band IV employees who were, as of April 21, *1238 2000, the date this action was filed, “Employees” as defined in Section 2.1(i) of the Pioneer Hi-Bred…”

Show all 41 citing cases →

— Iowa Code § 2.1(2) — 1 case

Larry R. Hedlund v. State of Iowa, 930 N.W.2d 707 (Iowa 2019). “2013); 1 Dobbs Law of Remedies § 2.1(2), at 59–60 (noting reinstatement is a form of specific performance, which is a type of injunctive relief, which is a type of equitable remedy); 2 Civil Actions 67 Against State and Local Government: Its Divisions, Agencies and Officers §…”

— Iowa Code § 2.1(I) — 1 case

Bartels v. Hennessey Bros., Inc., 164 N.W.2d 87 (Iowa 1969).

— Iowa Code § 2.1(a) — 1 case

State v. Johnson, 222 N.W.2d 453 (Iowa 1974).

— Iowa Code § 2.1(a)(ii)(4) — 1 case

State v. Weig, 285 N.W.2d 19 (Iowa 1979).

— Iowa Code § 2.1(a)(iii) — 1 case

State v. Hall, 235 N.W.2d 702 (Iowa 1975).

— Iowa Code § 2.1(b) — 4 cases

State of Iowa v. Earnest B. Bynum (Iowa 2020).

State of Iowa v. Nicholas Dean Wright (Iowa 2021).

— Iowa Code § 2.1(d) — 1 case

Bublitz v. EI duPont De Nemours & Co., 171 F. Supp. 2d 906 (S.D. Iowa 2001). “Plan § 2.1(d). It is clear that in this case the Change in Control occurred when DuPont acquired twenty-five percent of Pioneer’s stock on October 1,1999.”

— Iowa Code § 2.1(i) — 2 cases

Bublitz v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 202 F.R.D. 251 (S.D. Iowa 2001). “ure 23(a) requires the following prerequisites to bringing a class action: (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical…”

Bublitz v. EI duPont De Nemours & Co., 224 F. Supp. 2d 1234 (S.D. Iowa 2002). “On July 25, 2001, the Court certified a class of seventeen people defined as follows: Pioneer Pay Band III and Pay Band IV employees who were, as of April 21, *1238 2000, the date this action was filed, “Employees” as defined in Section 2.1(i) of the Pioneer Hi-Bred…”

— Iowa Code § 2.1(k) — 1 case

— Iowa Code § 2.1(t) — 4 cases

Bublitz v. E.I. duPont De Nemours & Co., 149 F. Supp. 2d 816 (S.D. Iowa 2001).

— Iowa Code § 2.1(t)(a) — 1 case

Bublitz v. E.I. duPont De Nemours & Co., 149 F. Supp. 2d 816 (S.D. Iowa 2001).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.