Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 2.11 (2026)

Officers and employees — compensation — prohibitions

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. Each house of the general assembly may employ such officers and employees as it shall deem necessary for the conduct of its business. The compensation of the chaplains, officers, and employees of the general assembly shall be fixed by joint action of the house and senate by resolution at the opening of each session, or as soon thereafter as conveniently can be done. Such persons shall be furnished by the state such supplies as may be necessary for the proper discharge of their duties.

2. Each house of the general assembly shall implement the sexual harassment prohibitions and grievance, violation, and disposition procedures of section 19B.12 for its respective full-time, part-time, and temporary employees, including, but not limited to, interns, clerks, and pages. Each house shall develop and cause to be distributed, at the time of hiring or orientation, a guide that describes for its employees the applicable sexual\n\nTue Dec 09 22:34:54 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 2 (62, 2) §2.11, GENERAL ASSEMBLY 6\n\nharassment prohibitions and grievance, violation, and disposition procedures. This section does not supersede the remedies provided under chapter 216. [C73, §12; C97, §13, 152; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §18, 19; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, §2.18, 2.19; C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §2.11] 92 Acts, ch 1086, §1 \n

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1969–2018 · leading case: Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (1983). · cites it 2× “Res. No. 6, 1983-1984 Sess.; Colo. H. R.”

State of Iowa v. Abraham K. Watkins, 914 N.W.2d 827 (Iowa 2018). · cites it 4× “1086, § 2 (codified at Iowa Code § 2.11 (1993)) (commanding each house of the general assembly to implement sexual harassment training and grievance procedures); id.”

Haupt v. Miller, 514 N.W.2d 905 (Iowa 1994). · cites it 2× “Liability against a corporate officer normally will not be imposed merely because of performing some general administrative responsibility.”

Inc. Town of Carter Lake v. Anderson Excavating & Wrecking Co., 241 N.W.2d 896 (Iowa 1976). “The daily or intermediate cover requirement of §§ 2.11 *903 and 4 was met only on a sporadic basis, mostly after commencement of the lawsuit.”

Prichard v. Dep't of Revenue, 164 N.W.2d 113 (Iowa 1969). · cites it 4× “I, section 2.11, pages 111 and 112, refers to the Iowa rule discussed in Division III, infra, as absurd and says: “Creation and Characteristics of Fee Simple Conditional Estates.”

Mahon v. St. Luke's Health Sys. Inc., 208 F. Supp. 2d 996 (N.D. Iowa 2002). · cites it 2× “, § 2.11, p. 6, App. at 9. In construing the 1976 Plan, St.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.