Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 2.6 (2026)
Permanent organization
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The members reported by the committee as holding certificates of election from the proper authority shall proceed to the permanent organization of their respective houses\n\nTue Dec 09 22:34:54 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 2 (62, 2) 3 GENERAL ASSEMBLY, §2.10\n\nby the election of officers and shall not be challenged as to their qualifications during the remainder of the term for which they were elected. [C51, §8; R60, §5; C73, §9; C97, §9; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §9; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, §2.5; C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §2.6]
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka Thomas, 877 N.W.2d 652 (Iowa 2016).
State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka Thomas, 877 N.W.2d 652 (Iowa 2016). “•See 1 LaFave § 2.6(b), at 834. 10 Article V section 6 of the Iowa *665 Constitution in turn provides district courts with jurisdiction over “civil and criminal matters arising in their respective districts.”
Qwest Commc'ns Co. v. Aventure Commc'ns Tech., LLC, 86 F. Supp. 3d 933 (S.D. Iowa 2015). “§ 2.6. Common Line: The term “Common Line” denotes a line, trunk, pay telephone line or other facility provided under the general and/or local exchange service tariffs of the Telephone Company, terminated on a central office switch.”
Aventure Commc'ns Tech., LLC v. Sprint Commc'ns Co., 224 F. Supp. 3d 706 (S.D. Iowa 2015). “§ 2.6. Common Line: *753 The term “Common Line” denotes a line, trunk, pay telephone line or other facility provided under the general and/or local exchange service tariffs of the Telephone Company, terminated on a central office switch.”
Des Moines Register & Tribune Co. v. Dwyer, 542 N.W.2d 491 (Iowa 1996). “The attorney general stated The right of each house to choose its own officers is derived from the Constitution whereas § 2.6 of the Code rises to the dignity only of a mere statutory enactment.”
State v. Barrett, 401 N.W.2d 184 (Iowa 1987). “LaFave Search and Seizure § 2.6, at 394 (1978) (quoting Note, Formalism, Legal Realism, and Constitutionally Protected Privacy Under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, 90 Harv.”
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. Vs. Thomas E. Lustgraaf, 792 N.W.2d 295 (Iowa 2010). “Cady, Iowa Practice Series: Lawyer and Judicial Ethics § 2.6(a), at 47 (2010) (noting under Iowa Court Rules effective prior to July 2005, the "Board .”
Diean Sabin v. Ivan Ackerman, 846 N.W.2d 835 (Iowa 2014). “Kurtz, Iowa Estates: Intestacy, Wills, and Estate Administration § 2.6, at 58 (3d ed.1995) [hereinafter Kurtz], It means the attorney has a duty to exercise reasonable skill and care in handling the administration of the estate for the executor or administrator.”
Amended June 22, 2016 State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka Thomas (Iowa 2016). “See 1 LaFave § 2.6(b), at 834. 10 Article V, section 6 of the Iowa Constitution in turn provides district courts with jurisdiction over “civil and criminal matters arising in their respective districts.”
Borst Bros. Constr., Inc. v. Thomas Dostal Developers, Inc. (Iowa Ct. App. 2021). “13B shall be superior to all other liens which may attach to or upon a building or improvement and to the land upon which it is situated, except liens of record prior to the time of the original commencement of the claimant’s work or the claimant’s improvements, except as…”
State of Iowa v. Nicholas Dean Wright (Iowa 2021). “” 1 LaFave § 2.6(c), at 933. Heinz violated that expectation and right when he accessed the contents without a warrant.”
State of Iowa v. Nicholas Dean Wright (Iowa 2021). “” 1 LaFave § 2.6(c), at 933. Heinz violated that expectation and right when he accessed the contents without a warrant.”
State of Iowa v. Nicholas Dean Wright (Iowa 2021). “” 1 LaFave § 2.6(c), at 933. Heinz violated that expectation and right when he accessed the contents without a warrant.”
— Iowa Code § 2.6(a) — 1 case
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. Vs. Thomas E. Lustgraaf, 792 N.W.2d 295 (Iowa 2010). “Cady, Iowa Practice Series: Lawyer and Judicial Ethics § 2.6(a), at 47 (2010) (noting under Iowa Court Rules effective prior to July 2005, the "Board .”
— Iowa Code § 2.6(b) — 3 cases
State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka Thomas, 877 N.W.2d 652 (Iowa 2016). “•See 1 LaFave § 2.6(b), at 834. 10 Article V section 6 of the Iowa *665 Constitution in turn provides district courts with jurisdiction over “civil and criminal matters arising in their respective districts.”
Amended June 22, 2016 State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka Thomas (Iowa 2016). “See 1 LaFave § 2.6(b), at 834. 10 Article V, section 6 of the Iowa Constitution in turn provides district courts with jurisdiction over “civil and criminal matters arising in their respective districts.”
State of Iowa v. Alison Elaine Dorsey (Iowa 2025).
— Iowa Code § 2.6(c) — 5 cases
State of Iowa v. Nicholas Dean Wright (Iowa 2021). “” 1 LaFave § 2.6(c), at 933. Heinz violated that expectation and right when he accessed the contents without a warrant.”
State of Iowa v. Nicholas Dean Wright (Iowa 2021). “” 1 LaFave § 2.6(c), at 933. Heinz violated that expectation and right when he accessed the contents without a warrant.”
State of Iowa v. Nicholas Dean Wright (Iowa 2021). “” 1 LaFave § 2.6(c), at 933. Heinz violated that expectation and right when he accessed the contents without a warrant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.