A respondent may defend against a proceeding before the board charging a violation of
chapter 21 or 22 on the ground that if such a violation occurred it was only harmless error
or that clear and convincing evidence demonstrated that grounds existed to justify a court to
issue an injunction against disclosure pursuant to section 22.8.
2012 Acts, ch 1115, §14, 17
\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2021 · leading case:
Hinders v. City of Ames, 329 N.W.2d 654 (Iowa 1983).
Hinders v. City of Ames, 329 N.W.2d 654 (Iowa 1983).
“Rhyne, The Law of Local Government Operations, § 23.11 at 652 (1980). Chapter 388 is part of the statutory scheme providing that authority, see also section 364.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.