After a hearing upon the appeal, the state board shall certify its decision to the county
auditor and to the parties to the appeal as provided by rule, and the decision shall be final.
The county auditor shall make up the records in accordance with the decision and the levying
board shall make its levy in accordance with the decision. Upon receipt of the decision, the
\n
Tue Dec 09 22:32:18 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 24 (34, 1)
§24.32, LOCAL BUDGETS 10\n\ncertifying board shall correct its records accordingly, if necessary. Final disposition of all
appeals shall be made by the state board within forty-five days after the date of the appeal
hearing.
[C39, §390.7; C46, 50, 54, §24.31; C58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §24.32; 82 Acts, ch 1079,
§5]
2016 Acts, ch 1138, §11
Referred to in §24.9, 331.436\n\n 24.33 Reserved.
\n
Notes of Decisions
Sondra Irving v. Emp. Appeal Bd., 883 N.W.2d 179 (Iowa 2016).
· cites it 4× “In this case, the employer failed to show that Irving could be disqualified under section 24.32(7). Sallis, 437 N.W.2d at 896 (holding employer has burden of showing disqualifying misconduct).”
Amended October 3, 2016 Sondra Irving v. Emp. Appeal Bd., No. 15–0104 (Iowa June 3, 2016).
· cites it 2× “In this case, the employer failed to show that Irving could be disqualified under section 24.32(7). Sallis, 437 N.W.2d at 896 (holding employer has burden of showing disqualifying misconduct).”
Iowa Code § 24.32(7): 2 cases
Sondra Irving v. Emp. Appeal Bd., 883 N.W.2d 179 (Iowa 2016).
“In this case, the employer failed to show that Irving could be disqualified under section 24.32(7). Sallis, 437 N.W.2d at 896 (holding employer has burden of showing disqualifying misconduct).”
Amended October 3, 2016 Sondra Irving v. Emp. Appeal Bd., No. 15–0104 (Iowa June 3, 2016).
“In this case, the employer failed to show that Irving could be disqualified under section 24.32(7). Sallis, 437 N.W.2d at 896 (holding employer has burden of showing disqualifying misconduct).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.