Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 301.3 (2026)

Annual settlement by board of directors

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

At the close of each school year the board of directors in each school district shall cause a complete settlement to be made with each depository agent. A complete inventory of the textbooks on hand, with a statement itemized to show the expenses authorized and paid by the board, and the amount of money collected from each such depository agent during the year from the sale or rental of textbooks, shall be made in duplicate, signed by the secretary of the board and the depository agent and one copy filed with the secretary and one with the depository agent. [C39, §4447.1; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §301.3]

\n

301.4 Payment from general fund. All the books and other supplies purchased under the provisions of this chapter shall be paid for out of the general fund. [C97, §2825; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §4448; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §301.4]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1972–1995 · leading case: State v. Hughes, 200 N.W.2d 559 (Iowa 1972).
State v. Hughes, 200 N.W.2d 559 (Iowa 1972). · cites it 2× “Model Penal Code § 301.3(1)(c) (1962) is in accord. Postponement of revocation proceedings until disposition of the criminal charge is *565 preferable procedure because it would minimize the hazard of unfairness in the proceeding.”
Fokkena v. Winston (In Re Johnson), 189 B.R. 744 (Bankr. D. Iowa 1995). “See also Russell, Bankruptcy Evidence Manual § 301.3 (1995). Other courts have required “some evidence” of solvency to rebut the presumption.”
Iowa Code § 301.3(1)(c): 1 case
State v. Hughes, 200 N.W.2d 559 (Iowa 1972). “Model Penal Code § 301.3(1)(c) (1962) is in accord. Postponement of revocation proceedings until disposition of the criminal charge is *565 preferable procedure because it would minimize the hazard of unfairness in the proceeding.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.