The board of supervisors shall provide for the manner in which the regulations and
restrictions and the boundaries of the districts shall be determined, established, and
enforced, and from time to time amended, supplemented, or changed. However, the
regulation, restriction, or boundary shall not become effective until after a public hearing,
at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard. Notice of the
time and place of the hearing shall be published as provided in section 331.305. The notice
shall state the location of the district affected by naming the township and section, and the\n\nTue Dec 09 22:14:47 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 335 (36, 1)
§335.6, COUNTY ZONING 4\n\nboundaries of the district shall be expressed in terms of streets or roads if possible. The
regulation, restriction, or boundary shall be adopted in compliance with section 331.302.
[C50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §358A.6]
87 Acts, ch 31, §1; 87 Acts, ch 43, §12
C93, §335.6
Referred to in §329.9, 335.7, 427B.1, 657.9
\n
Notes of Decisions
Perkins v. Bd. of Supervisors, 636 N.W.2d 58 (Iowa 2001).
· cites it 6× “This authority includes the power to designate areas of the county into districts and to regulate the use of property within those districts.”
Osage Conservation Club v. Bd. of Supervisors of Mitchell Cnty., 611 N.W.2d 294 (Iowa 2000).
· cites it 22× “The Board of supervisors of Mitchell County, Iowa seeks further review of a decision of the court of appeals which concluded that the Board’s failure to comply with public notice and hearing requirements, see Iowa Code §§ 335.6 and 335.7 (1997), deprived the Board of subject…”
Goodell v. Humboldt Cnty., 575 N.W.2d 486 (Iowa 1998).
· cites it 4× “See Iowa Code §§ 335.6 -.17. But chapter 331 mandates that any zoning power "shall be exercised in accordance with chapter 335.”
Robinson v. Linn Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors (Iowa Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 3× “Changes in the Ordinance Finally, the Robinsons argue that because the rezoning’s “material terms were not read at three consecutive meetings,” its passage was in violation of Linn 21 County Ordinance section 107-68(3)(g) and Iowa Code sections 335.6 and 331.302. Linn County…”
Friends of Bunker Mill Bridge, Inc. v. Washington Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors (Iowa Ct. App. 2019).
“2d at 299 (“We conclude that by failing to comply with the statutorily required public notice and hearing requirements of Iowa Code sections 335.6 and 335.7, the Board did not have subject matter jurisdiction to approve the application for rezoning of Sunset Acres Subdivision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.